IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/tec/bioche/v1y2020i1p46-55.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Screening Approach For Fast And Accurate Prediction Of Positive And Negative Urine Cultures By SediMAX Compared With The Standard Urine Culture

Author

Listed:
  • Massimo Pieri

    (Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy)

  • Flaminia Tomassetti

    (Department of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy)

  • Paola Cerini

    (Lifebrain srl; Viale Roma 190/A, Guidonia Montecelio, Rome, Italy)

  • Roberta Felicetti

    (Lifebrain srl; Viale Roma 190/A, Guidonia Montecelio, Rome, Italy)

  • Lucia Ceccaroni

    (Lifebrain srl; Viale Roma 190/A, Guidonia Montecelio, Rome, Italy)

  • Sergio Bernardini

    (Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy)

  • Graziella Calugi

    (Lifebrain srl; Viale Roma 190/A, Guidonia Montecelio, Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are the most frequent bacterial infections, and the detection of infection in urine samples is expensive and time-consuming. Also, in laboratories a significant proportion of samples processed yield negative results. For this, screening methods represent an important improvement towards the final UTI diagnosis. SediMAX is an automated microscopy, easier to use in laboratories due to its basic procedure and it is widely used for urine sediment analysis. In our study, we evaluated the performance of SediMAX, applying some screening parameters, compared with the gold standard methods, urine culture, to identify all the positive cases for UTI. We analysed 1185 urine samples from our daily laboratory routine. The basis of our screening model was to establish a cut-off for bacterial count (BACT), as 300 bacteria/µL in order to avoid missing positive cases. However, the sensitivity and the specificity achieved were not enough to identify all UTI infection in urine samples. So, in addition to BACT we have considered other parameters, such as White Blood Cell (WBC), Red Blood Cell (RBC), Yeasts (YEST), Age and Nitrates (NIT). The second screening method reached a sensitivity of 100%, that could be reliably employed in detect of UTIs.

Suggested Citation

  • Massimo Pieri & Flaminia Tomassetti & Paola Cerini & Roberta Felicetti & Lucia Ceccaroni & Sergio Bernardini & Graziella Calugi, 2020. "A New Screening Approach For Fast And Accurate Prediction Of Positive And Negative Urine Cultures By SediMAX Compared With The Standard Urine Culture," Technium BioChemMed: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Biology, Chemistry and Medicine ISSN 2734 - 7990, Technium Science, vol. 1(1), pages 46-55, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:tec:bioche:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:46-55
    DOI: 10.47577/biochemmed.v1i1.2451
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/biochemmed/article/view/2451/942
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://techniumscience.com/index.php/biochemmed/article/view/2451
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.47577/biochemmed.v1i1.2451?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Swear words; sociolinguistics; Angkola;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tec:bioche:v:1:y:2020:i:1:p:46-55. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Anna Maria Golita (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.