IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uteexx/v64y2019i4p346-367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multicriteria risk analysis of commodity-specific dock investments at an inland waterway port

Author

Listed:
  • Mackenzie Whitman
  • Hiba Baroud
  • Kash Barker

Abstract

Managing risks to critical infrastructure systems requires decision makers to account for impacts of disruptions that render these systems inoperable. This article evaluates dock-specific resource allocation strategies to improve port preparedness by integrating a dynamic risk-based interdependency model with weighted multicriteria decision analysis techniques. A weighted decision analysis technique allows for decision makers to balance widespread impacts due to cascading inoperability with certain industries that are important to the local economy. Further analysis of the relationship between inoperability and expected economic losses is explored per commodity flowing through the port, which allows an understanding of cascading impacts through interdependent industries. Uncertainty is accounted for through the use of probability distributions of total expected loss per industry that encompass the uncertainty of the length of disruption and severity of the impact that is mitigated by alternative strategies. A set of discrete allocations options of preparedness plans is analyzed in a study of the Port of Catoosa in Oklahoma along the Mississippi River Navigation System. The economic loss analysis showed that the integration of multicriteria decision analysis helps in prioritizing strategies according to several criteria such as gross domestic product (GDP) and decision maker risk aversion that are not typically addressed when strategies are prioritized according to the average interdependent economic losses alone.

Suggested Citation

  • Mackenzie Whitman & Hiba Baroud & Kash Barker, 2019. "Multicriteria risk analysis of commodity-specific dock investments at an inland waterway port," The Engineering Economist, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 64(4), pages 346-367, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:64:y:2019:i:4:p:346-367
    DOI: 10.1080/0013791X.2019.1580808
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0013791X.2019.1580808
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0013791X.2019.1580808?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sanjeev Bhurtyal & Sarah Hernandez & Sandra Eksioglu & Manzi Yves, 2024. "A two-stage stochastic optimization model for port infrastructure planning," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 26(2), pages 185-211, June.
    2. D. Espinoza & J. Morris & H. Baroud & M. Bisogno & A. Cifuentes & A. Gentzoglanis & L. Luccioni & J. Rojo & F. Vahedifard, 2020. "The role of traditional discounted cash flows in the tragedy of the horizon: another inconvenient truth," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 643-660, April.
    3. Kuttler, Emma & Ghorbani-Renani, Nafiseh & Barker, Kash & González, Andrés D. & Johansson, Jonas, 2024. "Protection-interdiction-restoration for resilient multi-commodity networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uteexx:v:64:y:2019:i:4:p:346-367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/UTEE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.