IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v93y2022i3p327-374.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Admitting Students in Context: Field Experiments on Information Dashboards in College Admissions

Author

Listed:
  • Michael N. Bastedo
  • D’Wayne Bell
  • Jessica S. Howell
  • Julian Hsu
  • Michael Hurwitz
  • Greg Perfetto
  • Meredith Welch

Abstract

In this paper, we address whether the provision of contextual information about where students live and learn has the potential to expand postsecondary opportunities to students from disadvantaged neighborhoods and high schools. To examine this question, we describe the results of field experiments with admissions officers working in eight universities who re-read real applications from previous admissions cycles with a dashboard of contextual data about the applicant’s neighborhood and high school. In this low-stakes context, admissions officers from institutions utilizing holistic admissions practices were more likely to recommend admitting low-SES applicants when provided with contextual data. The experiment also primed admissions readers to treat students from highly disadvantaged high school and neighborhood contexts more favorably relative to the results of the high-stakes official read, even when the dashboard was not shown to study participants. The results of this experiment suggest that contextualized data can improve equity in admissions, but fidelity to holistic admissions practices is crucial.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael N. Bastedo & D’Wayne Bell & Jessica S. Howell & Julian Hsu & Michael Hurwitz & Greg Perfetto & Meredith Welch, 2022. "Admitting Students in Context: Field Experiments on Information Dashboards in College Admissions," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 93(3), pages 327-374, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:93:y:2022:i:3:p:327-374
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2021.1971488
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2021.1971488
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2021.1971488?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:93:y:2022:i:3:p:327-374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.