IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v88y2017i3p297-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Engaging with Diversity: How Positive and Negative Diversity Interactions Influence Students’ Cognitive Outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Josipa Roksa
  • Cindy Ann Kilgo
  • Teniell L. Trolian
  • Ernest T. Pascarella
  • Charles Blaich
  • Kathleen S. Wise

Abstract

Although a growing body of research has demonstrated the value of interacting with diverse peers, a number of questions remain about the relationship between the quality of students’ diversity interactions and their cognitive development. In a longitudinal study following 3 cohorts of students from entry into college through the end of their 4th year, we examined how students’ positive and negative diversity interactions were related to 2 different outcomes: need for cognition and critical thinking skills. The results indicated that negative diversity interactions were strongly related to both outcomes, and that was the case for students of color and their white peers. Positive diversity interactions, on the other hand, were related to students’ need for cognition but not their critical thinking skills, and these interactions disproportionately benefitted white students. We conclude by considering the implications for understanding students’ cognitive development and implementing policies and practices that can facilitate positive outcomes on college campuses.

Suggested Citation

  • Josipa Roksa & Cindy Ann Kilgo & Teniell L. Trolian & Ernest T. Pascarella & Charles Blaich & Kathleen S. Wise, 2017. "Engaging with Diversity: How Positive and Negative Diversity Interactions Influence Students’ Cognitive Outcomes," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(3), pages 297-322, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:88:y:2017:i:3:p:297-322
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2016.1271690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2016.1271690
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2016.1271690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:88:y:2017:i:3:p:297-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.