IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/uhejxx/v87y2016i4p544-572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Settling in: The Role of Individual and Departmental Tactics in the Development of New Faculty Networks

Author

Listed:
  • Susan S. Fleming
  • Alyssa W. Goldman
  • Shelley J. Correli
  • Catherine J. Taylor

Abstract

Network formation is a key element of newcomer socialization; however, little is understood about how newcomer networks are formed in higher education. Drawing on a series of interviews with 34 new pre-tenure faculty members, we propose that just as individual and organizational socialization tactics interactively influence newcomer adjustment (Gruman, Saks, & Zweig, 2006), so too will they affect new faculty experiences with network formation. Our findings support this proposal; that is, individual employee characteristics, the practices of specific departments within the larger university, and the interaction between the two, create different degrees of network integration for faculty. Further, we find that in the context of university departments, organizational tactics may have a more significant effect on network development (and potentially other socialization outcomes) than those that stem from the individual. Building upon these findings, we also identify factors that facilitate new faculty network development and use these factors to suggest practical guidance for universities striving to enhance new faculty integration.

Suggested Citation

  • Susan S. Fleming & Alyssa W. Goldman & Shelley J. Correli & Catherine J. Taylor, 2016. "Settling in: The Role of Individual and Departmental Tactics in the Development of New Faculty Networks," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(4), pages 544-572, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:87:y:2016:i:4:p:544-572
    DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2016.11777413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777413
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00221546.2016.11777413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:uhejxx:v:87:y:2016:i:4:p:544-572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/uhej .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.