IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/ugitxx/v19y2016i2p75-79.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Information and Communication Technology Still a Force for Good?

Author

Listed:
  • Edward M. Roche

Abstract

From the beginning of the computer age in 1936, information and communication technology (ICT) has been a force for good. Business capacities were increased. Networks allowed the multinational enterprise to operate globally. The Internet improved scientific collaboration, fueled e-commerce, and connected seven billion persons around the world with Massive Online Open Courses (MOOC) and gaming. But there is a dark side to ICT. Employment is destroyed. Artificial intelligence (AI) is replacing humans in white collar jobs and being deployed in warfare. The “Dark Web” is facilitating criminal syndicates and terrorism. Privacy and individual autonomy has been lost forever. An accelerating cyber arms race threatens transportation, finance, electricity, and communication infrastructures. Further growth of ICT will not stop. We will see both good and bad consequences downstream.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward M. Roche, 2016. "Information and Communication Technology Still a Force for Good?," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 75-79, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:75-79
    DOI: 10.1080/1097198X.2016.1172952
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1097198X.2016.1172952
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1097198X.2016.1172952?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sylvia E. Peacock, 2020. "Politics, Public Goods, and Corporate Nudging in the HTTP/2 Standardization Process," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(4), pages 21582440209, November.
    2. Simplice A. Asongu & Jacinta C. Nwachukwu & Aqsa Aziz, 2018. "Determinants of Mobile Phone Penetration: Panel Threshold Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of Global Information Technology Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(2), pages 81-110, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:ugitxx:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:75-79. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/ugit .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.