IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/transp/v40y2017i4p465-478.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of traveler destination choice models by method of sampling alternatives

Author

Listed:
  • Jooyoung Kim
  • Seungjae Lee

Abstract

In a destination choice model, it is important to introduce alternatives that have been adequately aggregated into traffic analysis zone levels based on spatial similarities and feasibility of analysis, because considering every spatial location possible for the traveler as an elemental alternative is intractable in terms of data management and analysis. In this study, we derive strata for alternative sets through simple random sampling and stratified importance sampling based on the concept of Moran’s I. As a result of comparative analysis, we are able to reduce errors by drawing an adequate number of samples for the destination choice model’s choice alternative sets based on measures of spatial similarity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jooyoung Kim & Seungjae Lee, 2017. "Comparative analysis of traveler destination choice models by method of sampling alternatives," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 465-478, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:40:y:2017:i:4:p:465-478
    DOI: 10.1080/03081060.2017.1300242
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/03081060.2017.1300242
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/03081060.2017.1300242?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:transp:v:40:y:2017:i:4:p:465-478. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GTPT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.