IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tprsxx/v61y2023i15p5117-5133.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Balancing of assembly lines with collaborative robots: comparing approaches of the Benders’ decomposition algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Celso Gustavo Stall Sikora
  • Christian Weckenborg

Abstract

In recent years, human workers in manual assembly lines are increasingly being supported by the deployment of complementary technology. Collaborative robots (or cobots) represent a low-threshold opportunity for partial automation and are increasingly being utilised by manufacturing corporations. As collaborative robots can be used to either conduct tasks in parallel to the human worker or collaborate with the worker on an identic task, industrial planners experience an increasingly complex environment of assembly line balancing. This contribution proposes three different decomposition approaches for Benders’ decomposition algorithms exploring the multiple possible partitions of the formulation variables. We evaluate the performance of the algorithms by conducting extensive computational experiments using test instances from literature and compare the findings with results generated by a commercial solver and a metaheuristic solution procedure. The results demonstrate the Benders’ decomposition algorithms’ efficiency of finding exact solutions even for large instances, outperforming the benchmark procedures in computational effort and solution quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Celso Gustavo Stall Sikora & Christian Weckenborg, 2023. "Balancing of assembly lines with collaborative robots: comparing approaches of the Benders’ decomposition algorithm," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(15), pages 5117-5133, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:15:p:5117-5133
    DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2022.2093684
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207543.2022.2093684
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207543.2022.2093684?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tprsxx:v:61:y:2023:i:15:p:5117-5133. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TPRS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.