IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v19y2019i9p1102-1116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry

Author

Listed:
  • Luan Santos
  • André F. P. Lucena
  • Rafael Garaffa

Abstract

Energy-intensive industries play an important role in low-carbon development, being particularly exposed to climate policies. Concern over possible carbon leakage in this sector poses a major challenge for designing effective carbon pricing instruments (CPI). Different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure are currently used by different jurisdictions, each of them based on different approaches and indicators. This paper aims to analyse the extent to which the use of different methodologies leads to different results in terms of exposure to the risk of carbon leakage, using the Brazilian industry sector as a case study. Results indicate that carbon leakage exposure is an expected outcome of eventual CPI implementation in Brazilian industry. However, results vary according to the chosen methodology, so the definition of the criteria is paramount for assessing sectoral exposure to the risk of carbon leakage.Key policy insights Despite increasing discussion about the implementation of carbon pricing on the Brazilian industrial sector, the evaluation of carbon leakage risks is still neglected.Assessments of the risk of carbon leakage are directly related to the indicators and criteria used by each methodology. Thus, a given subsector may present different levels of exposure to carbon leakage depending on the methodological choice.More than a purely technical discussion, the methodological definition of carbon leakage risk is a political discussion – it can be well-conducted, leading to the success of a CPI, or even sabotaged, by implicitly subsidizing energy-intensive industries.

Suggested Citation

  • Luan Santos & André F. P. Lucena & Rafael Garaffa, 2019. "Would different methodologies for assessing carbon leakage exposure lead to different risk levels? A case study of the Brazilian industry," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(9), pages 1102-1116, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:19:y:2019:i:9:p:1102-1116
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2019.1627180
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2019.1627180
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2019.1627180?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version below or search for a different version of it.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fournier Gabela, Julio G. & Freund, Florian, 2022. "Potential carbon leakage risk: A cross-sector cross-country assessment in the OECD area," Conference papers 333468, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    2. J. G. Fournier Gabela & F. Freund, 2023. "Potential carbon leakage risk: a cross-sector cross-country assessment in the OECD area," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 176(5), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Li, Rongrong & Wang, Qiang & Wang, Xuefeng & Zhou, Yulin & Han, Xinyu & Liu, Yi, 2022. "Germany's contribution to global carbon reduction might be underestimated – A new assessment based on scenario analysis with and without trade," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    4. Luan Santos & Karl Steininger & Marcelle Candido Cordeiro & Johanna Vogel, 2022. "Current Status and Future Perspectives of Carbon Pricing Research in Austria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Wu, Libo & Zhou, Ying & Qian, Haoqi, 2022. "Global actions under the Paris agreement: Tracing the carbon leakage flow and pursuing countermeasures," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:19:y:2019:i:9:p:1102-1116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.