IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tcpoxx/v14y2014i5p637-664.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incorporating 'catastrophic' climate change into policy analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Elizabeth Kopits
  • Alex Marten
  • Ann Wolverton

Abstract

Although existing economic research is informative with regard to the importance of including potential 'catastrophic' climate change impacts in the analysis of GHG mitigation benefits, the generic and abstract form of the 'catastrophe' implemented has led to a lack of specific policy implications. This article provides an important starting point for a discussion of how to improve economic modelling of potential large-scale impacts of climate change. It considers how the term 'abrupt climate change' has been used in the scientific literature to describe changes in the climate system and carefully reviews the characteristics of the events that have been discussed in this context. The findings are compared to the way in which the economic literature has modelled potential economic and human welfare impacts of these 'catastrophic' events. In general, the economics literature is found to have modelled such impacts in a uniform way that fails to account for differences in relevant end points and timescales. The result is policy recommendations based on events that do not resemble those of concern. Better treatment of these events in integrated assessment modelling would help ensure that future research efforts can serve as meaningful policy input. Policy relevance It has often been stated that current studies aimed at understanding the magnitude of optimal climate policy fail to adequately capture the potential for 'catastrophic' impacts of climate change. Existing economic modelling has provided evidence that, in general, potential climate catastrophes might significantly influence the optimal path of abatement. However, there is a need to move beyond experiments that are detached from important details of the climate problem to substantively inform the policy debate and improve analyses of GHG mitigation benefits (e.g. social cost of carbon estimates). This article identifies areas where modelling could be improved even within current frameworks and others where additional work is needed.

Suggested Citation

  • Elizabeth Kopits & Alex Marten & Ann Wolverton, 2014. "Incorporating 'catastrophic' climate change into policy analysis," Climate Policy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(5), pages 637-664, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:14:y:2014:i:5:p:637-664
    DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2014.864947
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14693062.2014.864947
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14693062.2014.864947?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Newell, Richard G. & Prest, Brian C. & Sexton, Steven E., 2021. "The GDP-Temperature relationship: Implications for climate change damages," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    2. Yongyang Cai & Thomas S. Lontzek, 2019. "The Social Cost of Carbon with Economic and Climate Risks," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 127(6), pages 2684-2734.
    3. Ram Nayan Yadava & Bhaskar Sinha, 2020. "Vulnerability Assessment of Forest Fringe Villages of Madhya Pradesh, India for Planning Adaptation Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-17, February.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tcpoxx:v:14:y:2014:i:5:p:637-664. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/tcpo20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.