IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/servic/v18y1998i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Benchmarking to Improve the Strategic Planning Process in the Hotel Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Paul Phillips
  • Kwaku Appiah-Adu

Abstract

Gaining the knowledge of a firm's relative position in key qualitative processes should be an essential objective of the strategic planning process. This article shows how the managerial technique of benchmarking can be used to go beyond traditional quantitative analysis and penetrate underlying qualitative processes. Benchmarking is used to assess the quality of four key strategic planning design parameters (formality, participation, sophistication and thoroughness) among 63 hotel units representing eight UK hotel groups. Results indicate that there is a significant gap between the quality of current planning processes with theoretical best practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Paul Phillips & Kwaku Appiah-Adu, 1998. "Benchmarking to Improve the Strategic Planning Process in the Hotel Sector," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:18:y:1998:i:1:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1080/02642069800000001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/02642069800000001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/02642069800000001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rhodri Thomas & Jonathan Long, 2000. "Improving Competitiveness," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 14(4), pages 313-328, February.
    2. Nadja Hatzijordanou & Nicolai Bohn & Orestis Terzidis, 2019. "A systematic literature review on competitor analysis: status quo and start-up specifics," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 69(4), pages 415-458, November.
    3. Hokey Min & Hyesung Min & Seong Jong Joo, 2007. "A data envelopment analysis on assessing the competitiveness of Korean hotels," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 367-385, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:servic:v:18:y:1998:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FSIJ20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.