IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsocxx/v8y2013i2p120-129.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teaching policy and practice: early years, neoliberalism and communities of practice

Author

Listed:
  • Ewan Ingleby

Abstract

This article explores the proposal that the emergence of the concept of communities of practice in early years education (with children aged from birth to 8) is symptomatic of neoliberal educational policies. A community of practice is defined by Lave and Wenger [ Situated learning-legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1991)] and Wenger [ Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1998)] as a way of thinking about how social practices are gathered together and how people learn to participate in them. Drawing on the work of Bourdieu, Foucault and Weber, this study deconstructs the neoliberal early years in the educational context. The policies within this context appear to be tied together by philosophical strands that are based on marketisation, discourse and the setting of bureaucratic standards. The consequences of neoliberalism for early years are interpreted through a textured analytical approach that draws on the work of key thinkers in the social sciences. The article explores the current debates over the benefits of establishing communities of practice in the early years. The concept of communities of practice is considered by discussing the extent to which the ideal is symptomatic of neoliberal educational policies in the early years.

Suggested Citation

  • Ewan Ingleby, 2013. "Teaching policy and practice: early years, neoliberalism and communities of practice," Contemporary Social Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(2), pages 120-129, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:120-129
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.751505
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21582041.2012.751505
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:120-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsoc21 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.