IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Teaching policy and practice: early years, neoliberalism and communities of practice

Listed author(s):
  • Ewan Ingleby
Registered author(s):

    This article explores the proposal that the emergence of the concept of communities of practice in early years education (with children aged from birth to 8) is symptomatic of neoliberal educational policies. A community of practice is defined by Lave and Wenger [ Situated learning-legitimate peripheral participation . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1991)] and Wenger [ Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (1998)] as a way of thinking about how social practices are gathered together and how people learn to participate in them. Drawing on the work of Bourdieu, Foucault and Weber, this study deconstructs the neoliberal early years in the educational context. The policies within this context appear to be tied together by philosophical strands that are based on marketisation, discourse and the setting of bureaucratic standards. The consequences of neoliberalism for early years are interpreted through a textured analytical approach that draws on the work of key thinkers in the social sciences. The article explores the current debates over the benefits of establishing communities of practice in the early years. The concept of communities of practice is considered by discussing the extent to which the ideal is symptomatic of neoliberal educational policies in the early years.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Contemporary Social Science.

    Volume (Year): 8 (2013)
    Issue (Month): 2 (June)
    Pages: 120-129

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:120-129
    DOI: 10.1080/21582041.2012.751505
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsocxx:v:8:y:2013:i:2:p:120-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.