IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v17y2014i2p107-120.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emergent models of sport development and delivery: The case of triathlon in Australia and the US

Author

Listed:
  • Pamm Phillips
  • Brianna Newland

Abstract

•Examines the emerging models of sport development in triathlon in Australia and the US.•Illustrates the increasing involvement of third party organisations and local councils in sport development and delivery.•Third party organisations taking over activities that would normally be the responsibility of the respective governing bodies.•Governing bodies are grappling with finding relevance and legitimacy in triathlon.•Implications for sport management research, practice, and education are discussed.Sport development is a core concern for all nations as they seek to enhance elite performance and cultivate opportunities for mass participation. In the sport of triathlon, new models for sport development have been shown to exist where third party organisations have a critical role in the delivery of it. Using institutional theory as a framework, the purpose of this study was to explore the emerging models of sport development in triathlon. A case study of triathlon in Australia and in the United States was used. The results illustrated emerging models of sport development in both the US and Australia. Third party organisations as well as local councils have become increasingly involved in the creation and implementation of programmes and activities that would normally be the responsibility of a governing body. As such, the organisational fields and institutional logics in triathlon are rendering governing bodies irrelevant. Governing bodies are grappling with finding relevance and legitimacy in triathlon. Implications for sport management research, practice, and education are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Pamm Phillips & Brianna Newland, 2014. "Emergent models of sport development and delivery: The case of triathlon in Australia and the US," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(2), pages 107-120, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:17:y:2014:i:2:p:107-120
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2013.07.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2013.07.001
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2013.07.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kumar, Harish & Manoli, Argyro Elisavet & Hodgkinson, Ian R. & Downward, Paul, 2018. "Sport participation: From policy, through facilities, to users’ health, well-being, and social capital," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 21(5), pages 549-562.
    2. Pedras, Loïc & Taylor, Tracy & Frawley, Stephen, 2020. "Responses to multi-level institutional complexity in a national sport federation," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 23(3), pages 482-497.
    3. Jumana Waleed & Ahmad Taher Azar & Saad Albawi & Waleed Khaild Al-Azzawi & Ibraheem Kasim Ibraheem & Ahmed Alkhayyat & Ibrahim A. Hameed & Nashwa Ahmad Kamal, 2022. "An Effective Deep Learning Model to Discriminate Coronavirus Disease From Typical Pneumonia," International Journal of Service Science, Management, Engineering, and Technology (IJSSMET), IGI Global, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, January.
    4. Truyens, Jasper & De Bosscher, Veerle & Sotiriadou, Popi & Heyndels, Bruno & Westerbeek, Hans, 2016. "A method to evaluate countries’ organisational capacity: A four country comparison in athletics," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 279-292.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:17:y:2014:i:2:p:107-120. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.