IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rsmrxx/v15y2012i4p485-499.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Repeat participation as a function of program attractiveness, socializing opportunities, loyalty and the sportscape across three sport facility contexts

Author

Listed:
  • Brad Hill
  • B. Christine Green

Abstract

► We examined differences across facilities in terms of program attractiveness, socializing opportunities, loyalty and sportscape factors on repeat participation. ► Differences emerged among factors across facilities and with varied affects on participation frequency. ► Sportscape factors had most impact on participation frequency at health and fitness centers.Effects of sport facility services of program attractiveness, socializing opportunities customer loyalty, and the sportscape on frequency of participation at three different types of sport facilities; special purpose – health and fitness centers, single-purpose – tennis, golf or swim pool amenities, and multi-use – gymnasia were examined. The purpose of the study was to identify differences between, and effects on, participation at different types of participant sport facilities due to service quality. Data were collected on a sample of 1199 participants from a mid-sized east coast Australian city. Linear restrictions testing determined that the three sport facility types were significantly different in the ways in which the constructs affect repeat participation. The sportscape has the most impact on participation frequency at fitness facilities, and minimal impact on participation at multi-sport facilities. Implications for retaining customers at each facility type are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Brad Hill & B. Christine Green, 2012. "Repeat participation as a function of program attractiveness, socializing opportunities, loyalty and the sportscape across three sport facility contexts," Sport Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 485-499, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:485-499
    DOI: 10.1016/j.smr.2012.03.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1016/j.smr.2012.03.006
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.smr.2012.03.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koronios K. & Psiloutsikou M. & Kriemadis A., 2016. "What motivates repeated participation in ultra-endurance events? A comparison between runners and cyclists," Business & Entrepreneurship Journal, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 5(2), pages 1-2.
    2. Howat, Gary & Assaker, Guy, 2016. "Outcome quality in participant sport and recreation service quality models: Empirical results from public aquatic centres in Australia," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 19(5), pages 520-535.
    3. O’Reilly, Norm & Berger, Ida E. & Hernandez, Tony & Parent, Milena M. & Séguin, Benoit, 2015. "Urban sportscapes: An environmental deterministic perspective on the management of youth sport participation," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 291-307.
    4. Tu, Rungting & Hsieh, Peishan & Feng, Wenting, 2019. "Walking for fun or for “likes”? The impacts of different gamification orientations of fitness apps on consumers’ physical activities," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 682-693.
    5. Hanlon, Clare & Morris, Tony & Nabbs, Susan, 2014. "Program providers’ perspective: Recruitment and retention strategies for women in physical activity programs," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 133-144.
    6. Yoshida, Masayuki, 2017. "Consumer experience quality: A review and extension of the sport management literature," Sport Management Review, Elsevier, vol. 20(5), pages 427-442.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rsmrxx:v:15:y:2012:i:4:p:485-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rsmr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.