IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpxmxx/v21y2019i4p581-605.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing and explaining interagency collaboration performance: a comparative case study of local governments in China

Author

Listed:
  • Rui Mu
  • Martin de Jong
  • Joop Koppenjan

Abstract

This study assesses and explains interagency collaboration performance in the Chinese public sector. Through a comparative case study, it shows that inter-organizational relation is hard to start up; conflicting policies, incompatible procedures, power disparity, low issue salience, and lack of perceived interdependence may separately and jointly affect collaboration performance. The presence of vertical meta-governance plays a critical role in turning the tide; however, its presence is tied up with other factors such as high issue salience or bottom-up appeal. In addition, the highest level of performance not only depends on vertical meta-governance but also on horizontal meta-governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Rui Mu & Martin de Jong & Joop Koppenjan, 2019. "Assessing and explaining interagency collaboration performance: a comparative case study of local governments in China," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 581-605, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:21:y:2019:i:4:p:581-605
    DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2018.1508607
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/14719037.2018.1508607
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/14719037.2018.1508607?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Shuo Li, 2021. "Legal Instruments for the Integration and Cooperation in the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA): Better Implementation of the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-18, November.
    2. Liming Suo & Xue Li & Shuai Cao, 2023. "How governance boundaries affect regional collaboration on atmospheric governance—Evidence from China's Yangtze River Delta," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(4), pages 509-533, July.
    3. Wenjie Zhou & Rui Mu, 2019. "Exploring Coordinative Mechanisms for Environmental Governance in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area: An Ecology of Games Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-33, June.
    4. Wanjuan Wang & Hongbo Gong, 2022. "Formation Mechanism of a Coastal Zone Environment Collaborative Governance Relationship: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis Based on fsQCA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-26, September.
    5. Zhenhua Zhang & Guoxing Zhang & Yi Hu & Yating Jiang & Cheng Zhou & Jiahui Ma, 2023. "The evolutionary mechanism of haze collaborative governance: novel evidence from a tripartite evolutionary game model and a case study in China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Martin de Jong, 2019. "From Eco-Civilization to City Branding: A Neo-Marxist Perspective of Sustainable Urbanization in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(20), pages 1-14, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpxmxx:v:21:y:2019:i:4:p:581-605. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rpxm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.