IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rpanxx/v17y2017i5p752-762.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological approaches to determine the “U”-pacing strategy in cycling time trial

Author

Listed:
  • Rafael Azevedo
  • Ramon Cruz
  • Marcos Silva-Cavalcante
  • Renata Silva
  • Carlos Correia-Oliveira
  • Patrícia Couto
  • Adriano Lima-Silva
  • Romulo Bertuzzi

Abstract

The present study proposed two models (visual and mathematical) to determine the three phases of “U”-pacing profile during a cycling time trial. The reliability of visual model was tested and models were compared. Fifteen cyclists performed a maximal incremental test and two 4-km TT. For the visual model, four experienced evaluators analysed twice the pacing, seven days apart. The mathematical model consisted on the mean of power output during phase 2 (1- until 3 km) plus two standard deviations, to distinguish phase 2 change points between phases 1 (CP1) and 3 (CP2). The CP1 occurred at 419 ± 186 and 415 ± 178 m for visual and mathematical model and CP2 occurred at 3646 ± 228 and 3809 ± 213 m, respectively. There was no difference between models for both CP (p <0.05). The within-evaluator visual model reliability for CP1 was ICC >0.87 and CP2 was ICC >0.96 (p <0.05), and between-evaluator reliability was ICC > 0.89 (p <0.05). Bland–Altman plots showed agreement between models, most the difference was <5%. The visual and mathematical models are reliable and produce similar values for determining main phases of the “U”-pacing profile during a cycling TT.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafael Azevedo & Ramon Cruz & Marcos Silva-Cavalcante & Renata Silva & Carlos Correia-Oliveira & Patrícia Couto & Adriano Lima-Silva & Romulo Bertuzzi, 2017. "Methodological approaches to determine the “U”-pacing strategy in cycling time trial," International Journal of Performance Analysis in Sport, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 752-762, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:5:p:752-762
    DOI: 10.1080/24748668.2017.1399322
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/24748668.2017.1399322
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/24748668.2017.1399322?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venkata Jandhyala & Stergios Fotopoulos & Ian MacNeill & Pengyu Liu, 2013. "Inference for single and multiple change-points in time series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(4), pages 423-446, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniela Jarušková, 2015. "Detecting non-simultaneous changes in means of vectors," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 24(4), pages 681-700, December.
    2. Michael Messer, 2022. "Bivariate change point detection: Joint detection of changes in expectation and variance," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 49(2), pages 886-916, June.
    3. Chen, Zhanshou & Xu, Qiongyao & Li, Huini, 2019. "Inference for multiple change points in heavy-tailed time series via rank likelihood ratio scan statistics," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 53-56.
    4. Lee, Taewook & Baek, Changryong, 2020. "Block wild bootstrap-based CUSUM tests robust to high persistence and misspecification," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    5. Chih‐Hao Chang & Kam‐Fai Wong & Wei‐Yee Lim, 2023. "Threshold estimation for continuous three‐phase polynomial regression models with constant mean in the middle regime," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(1), pages 4-47, February.
    6. Inder Tecuapetla-Gómez & Axel Munk, 2017. "Autocovariance Estimation in Regression with a Discontinuous Signal and m-Dependent Errors: A Difference-Based Approach," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(2), pages 346-368, June.
    7. Camillo Cammarota, 2017. "Estimating the turning point location in shifted exponential model of time series," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(7), pages 1269-1281, May.
    8. Daniela Jarušková, 2018. "Estimating non-simultaneous changes in the mean of vectors," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 81(6), pages 721-743, August.
    9. Woody, Jonathan & Lund, Robert, 2014. "A linear regression model with persistent level shifts: An alternative to infill asymptotics," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 118-124.
    10. Stergios B. Fotopoulos & Alex Paparas & Venkata K. Jandhyala, 2022. "Change point detection and estimation methods under gamma series of observations," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 723-754, June.
    11. Sangwon Hyun & Kevin Z. Lin & Max G'Sell & Ryan J. Tibshirani, 2021. "Post‐selection inference for changepoint detection algorithms with application to copy number variation data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 77(3), pages 1037-1049, September.
    12. Holger Dette & Dominik Wied, 2016. "Detecting relevant changes in time series models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 78(2), pages 371-394, March.
    13. Castrillón-Candás, Julio E. & Kon, Mark, 2022. "Anomaly detection: A functional analysis perspective," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    14. Shi, Xuesheng & Gallagher, Colin & Lund, Robert & Killick, Rebecca, 2022. "A comparison of single and multiple changepoint techniques for time series data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Woody, Jonathan, 2015. "Time series regression with persistent level shifts," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 22-29.
    16. Roberto Baragona & Francesco Battaglia & Domenico Cucina, 2016. "Empirical Likelihood for Outlier Detection and Estimation in Autoregressive Time Series," Journal of Time Series Analysis, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(3), pages 315-336, May.
    17. Bouzebda, Salim & Ferfache, Anouar Abdeldjaoued, 2023. "Asymptotic properties of semiparametric M-estimators with multiple change points," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 609(C).
    18. Ponciano, José M. & Taper, Mark L. & Dennis, Brian, 2018. "Ecological change points: The strength of density dependence and the loss of history," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 45-59.
    19. Shu, Lei & Chen, Yu & Zhang, Weiping & Wang, Xueqin, 2022. "Spatial rank-based high-dimensional change point detection via random integration," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    20. Skrobotov, Anton, 2020. "Survey on structural breaks and unit root tests," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 58, pages 96-141.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rpanxx:v:17:y:2017:i:5:p:752-762. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RPAN20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.