IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rgfmxx/v15y2024i2p253-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How do moral judgment and saving face interact with positive word–of–mouth regarding counterfeit luxury consumption?

Author

Listed:
  • Changju Kim
  • Mai Kikumori
  • Aekyoung Kim
  • Jungkeun Kim

Abstract

This study empirically investigates the combined effects of social factors such as word-of-mouth (WOM) and individual psychological factors such as moral judgment and saving face on consumers’ purchases of counterfeit luxury goods. Using a snowball sampling method, we gathered data from 257 Chinese consumers who had purchased counterfeits and tested our hypotheses using a hierarchical multiple regression model. We found that positive WOM and moral judgment increased counterfeit luxury purchases. Interestingly, saving face was found to mitigate the impact of positive WOM on counterfeit luxury purchases. This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge on consumer behavior regarding counterfeit luxury purchases by introducing innovative insights and proposing new moderating predictions related to moral judgment and saving face. Additionally, the findings have practical implications for global luxury companies, enabling them to devise effective marketing and communication strategies that dissuade consumers from buying counterfeits. In particular, the study emphasizes the importance of considering saving face from a cultural standpoint to discourage counterfeit purchases.

Suggested Citation

  • Changju Kim & Mai Kikumori & Aekyoung Kim & Jungkeun Kim, 2024. "How do moral judgment and saving face interact with positive word–of–mouth regarding counterfeit luxury consumption?," Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 253-269, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:253-269
    DOI: 10.1080/20932685.2023.2234919
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/20932685.2023.2234919
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/20932685.2023.2234919?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rgfmxx:v:15:y:2024:i:2:p:253-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rgfm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.