IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/regstd/v45y2011i8p1157-1170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning How to Deal with Values, Frames and Governance in Sustainability Appraisal

Author

Listed:
  • Alan Bond
  • Trudie Dockerty
  • Andrew Lovett
  • Andrew Riche
  • Alison Haughton
  • David Bohan
  • Rufus Sage
  • Ian Shield
  • Jon Finch
  • Martin Turner
  • Angela Karp

Abstract

Bond A. J., Dockerty T., Lovett A., Riche A. B., Haughton A. J., Bohan D. A., Sage R. B., Shield I. F., Finch J. W., Turner M. M. and Karp A. Learning how to deal with values, frames and governance in Sustainability Appraisal, Regional Studies. The effectiveness of Sustainability Appraisal is highly contested because of the value-based nature of the assumed goal (sustainable development), because effectiveness itself can be determined through different theoretical framings, and because good governance does not guarantee sustainable outcomes. Drawing on learning derived from the literature and a case study examining biomass crop planting on a regional scale in England, an approach for managing the Sustainability Appraisal development and application process is proposed. This incorporates analytic-deliberative techniques as the basis for more pluralism, combined with constraints mapping. Such an approach, it is suggested, can better accommodate multiple framings. [image omitted] Bond A. J., Dockerty T., Lovett A., Riche A. B., Haughton A. J., Bohan D. A., Sage R. B., Shield I. F., Finch J. W., Turner M. M. et Karp A. Apprendre comment traiter les valeurs, les cadres et la gouvernance dans une evaluation du Developpement durable, Regional Studies. L'efficacite de l'evaluation du Developpement durable est tres discutee a cause des caracteristiques du pretendu objectif (a savoir le developpement durable) qui sont bases sur les valeurs, parce que l'on peut determiner l'efficacite elle-meme a partir de differents cadres theoriques, et car la bonne gouvernance n'assure pas de resultats durables. Puisant dans l'apprentissage qui provient de la documentation et dans une etude de cas qui examine la plantation de cultures biomasses sur le plan regional en Angleterre, on propose une facon de gerer le processus de mise au point et de mise en oeuvre du Developpement durable. Cela comprend des techniques analytico-deliberatives comme la base d'un pluralisme augmente, conjointement avec une elaboration des contraintes. On suggere qu'une telle facon peut mieux s'adapter aux cadres multiples. Evaluation du Developpement durable Cultures biomasses Elaboration des contraintes Apprentissage Analytico-deliberatif Pluralisme Bond A. J., Dockerty T., Lovett A., Riche A. B., Haughton A. J., Bohan D. A., Sage R. B., Shield I. F., Finch J. W., Turner M. M. und Karp A. Erlernen des Umgangs mit Werten, Rahmen und Steuerung bei der Nachhaltigkeitsprufung, Regional Studies. Die Wirksamkeit einer Uberprufung der Nachhaltigkeit ist stark umstritten, weil das angenommene Ziel (nachhaltige Entwicklung) eine wertbasierte Natur aufweist, weil sich die Wirksamkeit selbst in verschiedenen theoretischen Rahmen ermitteln lasst und weil eine gute Steuerung kein Garant fur nachhaltige Ergebnisse ist. Aufbauend auf den Ergebnissen der Literatur und einer Fallstudie, bei der der Anbau von Biomassepflanzen in regionalem Massstab in England untersucht wird, wird ein Ansatz fur die Leitung der Entwicklung und Anwendung einer Nachhaltigkeitsprufung vorgeschlagen. Hierbei kommen analytisch-deliberative Techniken als Grundlage fur mehr Pluralismus sowie eine Kartierung der Einschrankungen zum Einsatz. Durch einen solchen Ansatz lassen sich unserer These zufolge verschiedenartige Rahmen besser miteinander vereinbaren. Nachhaltigkeitsprufung Biomassepflanzen Kartierung von Einschrankungen Lernen Analytisch-deliberativ Pluralismus Bond A. J., Dockerty T., Lovett A., Riche A. B., Haughton A. J., Bohan D. A., Sage R. B., Shield I. F., Finch J. W., Turner M. M. y Karp A. Aprender como tratar los valores, las estructuras y la gobernanza en la valoracion de la sostenibilidad, Regional Studies. La eficacia de la valoracion de la sostenibilidad se cuestiona en gran medida debido a la naturaleza basada en los valores del objetivo supuesto (desarrollo sostenible), a que la misma eficacia puede determinarse a traves de diferentes estructuras teoricas y a que la buena gobernanza no garantiza resultados sostenibles. Basandonos en el aprendizaje derivado de la literatura y un estudio de caso en el que se examina la plantacion de biomasa a escala regional en Inglaterra, proponemos un planteamiento para gestionar el desarrollo y la puesta en practica de la valoracion de la sostenibilidad. Anadimos tecnicas analiticas deliberativas como base para mas pluralismo, combinado con un examen de las restricciones. Sugerimos que un planteamiento de este tipo puede adaptarse mejor a las diferentes estructuras. Valoracion de la sostenibilidad Cultivos de biomasa Examen de las restricciones Aprendizaje Analitico deliberativo Pluralismo

Suggested Citation

  • Alan Bond & Trudie Dockerty & Andrew Lovett & Andrew Riche & Alison Haughton & David Bohan & Rufus Sage & Ian Shield & Jon Finch & Martin Turner & Angela Karp, 2011. "Learning How to Deal with Values, Frames and Governance in Sustainability Appraisal," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(8), pages 1157-1170.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:45:y:2011:i:8:p:1157-1170
    DOI: 10.1080/00343404.2010.485181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00343404.2010.485181
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sala, Serenella & Ciuffo, Biagio & Nijkamp, Peter, 2015. "A systemic framework for sustainability assessment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 314-325.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:regstd:v:45:y:2011:i:8:p:1157-1170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CRES20 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.