IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/rcjaxx/v2y2014i4p294-322.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

External auditor types and the cost stickiness of listed companies

Author

Listed:
  • Shangkun Liang
  • Dong Chen
  • Xiaoli Hu

Abstract

External auditing is an important method of corporate governance that can effectively monitor and restrict a manager’s opportunistic behaviour and reduce cost stickiness. We focus on Chinese A-shares listed companies from 2002 to 2010 to explore the governance role of external auditors in cost stickiness. We classify audit firms into three types: the Big Four International, the Big Ten Domestic, and the non-Big Ten Domestic. The results show that the cost stickiness of firms audited by the Big Four International is significantly lower, while the cost stickiness difference between firms audited by the latter two types is not significant. Further tests show that the restriction on cost stickiness for the Big Four International is more significant when the largest shareholder’s shareholding ratio is lower or when the local market is less developed. These results indicate that the restriction placed by audit quality on cost stickiness varies with other corporate governance mechanisms. Our results are qualitatively unchanged under different robustness tests, including propensity score matching. This study shows that Big Four International audit firms can better reduce cost stickiness, which provides evidence of the higher audit quality of these firms and extends the study of restrictive factors on cost stickiness to external corporate governance mechanisms.

Suggested Citation

  • Shangkun Liang & Dong Chen & Xiaoli Hu, 2014. "External auditor types and the cost stickiness of listed companies," China Journal of Accounting Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2(4), pages 294-322, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:2:y:2014:i:4:p:294-322
    DOI: 10.1080/21697213.2014.982004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/21697213.2014.982004
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/21697213.2014.982004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:rcjaxx:v:2:y:2014:i:4:p:294-322. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/rcja .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.