IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/nzecpp/v55y2021i1p19-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

City with a billion dollar view

Author

Listed:
  • G.C.K. Cooper
  • K. Namit

Abstract

The growth and intensification of many urban areas has meant city governments increasingly face pressure to limit development to preserve iconic city views. This is frequently achieved through ‘viewshafts’ or ‘sight lines’ that regulate development height across vast urban landscapes. While prevalent in many planning rule books, these policies are rarely subjected to rigorous economic appraisal, despite the large costs they can impose on local areas. We use a regression discontinuity to evaluate one such policy in Auckland, New Zealand which bifurcates the central business district (CBD). We find that the net cost of the policy to the local area is NZ$1.366 billion, or 16% of private land value in the CBD. At the margin, the constraint reduces land values by 40%. While removing these policies is not always easy or necessarily desirable, there may be value in optimization. One theoretical viewshaft alignment could reduce the net cost by 43%.

Suggested Citation

  • G.C.K. Cooper & K. Namit, 2021. "City with a billion dollar view," New Zealand Economic Papers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(1), pages 19-37, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:55:y:2021:i:1:p:19-37
    DOI: 10.1080/00779954.2018.1509110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00779954.2018.1509110
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00779954.2018.1509110?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:nzecpp:v:55:y:2021:i:1:p:19-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RNZP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.