IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jenpmg/v59y2016i1p22-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison of preservation values between Internet and interview survey modes: the case of Dokdo, South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Choong-Ki Lee
  • Tae-Kyun Kim
  • James W. Mjelde

Abstract

With the increase in employment of Internet surveys, there is a need to address how this survey mode affects inferences. Internet and interview modes are compared in estimating the preservation value of Dokdo, South Korea. Estimates of willingness to pay in the Internet survey are smaller than those in the interview survey. This may be attributable to the interview respondents being conscious of the presence of the interviewers, given the social importance of Dokdo to Koreans. Internet surveys may be effective in reducing overestimation of the willingness to pay in situations where potential social desirability is present.

Suggested Citation

  • Choong-Ki Lee & Tae-Kyun Kim & James W. Mjelde, 2016. "Comparison of preservation values between Internet and interview survey modes: the case of Dokdo, South Korea," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 59(1), pages 22-43, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:1:p:22-43
    DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2014.980900
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09640568.2014.980900
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09640568.2014.980900?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zawojska, Ewa & Czajkowski, Mikotaj, 2017. "Are preferences stated in web vs. personal interviews different? A comparison of willingness to pay results for a large multi-country study of the Baltic Sea eutrophication reduction," Annual Meeting, 2017, June 18-21, Montreal, Canada 258604, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society.
    2. Nigora Baymuminova & Guljakhon Shermukhammedova & Jeong-Gil Choi, 2023. "Estimating the Economic Value of Ichan Kala Using the Contingent Valuation Method (CVM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Kiriaki M. Keramitsoglou & Katja Lozar Manfreda & Charalampia Anastasiou & Knut Kalgraff Skjak & Konstantinos P. Tsagarakis, 2018. "Mode comparison study on willingness to buy and willingness to pay for organic foods: paper-and-pencil versus computerized questionnaire," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 18(3), pages 587-603, September.
    4. MikoĊ‚aj Czajkowski & Ewa Zawojska & Norman Meade & Ronaldo Seroa da Motta & Mike Welsh & Ramon Arigoni Ortiz, 2022. "On the inference about willingness to pay distribution using contingent valuation data," Working Papers 2022-08, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    5. Meilan Jin & Yuxian Juan & Youngjoon Choi & Choong-Ki Lee, 2019. "Estimating the Preservation Value of World Heritage Site Using Contingent Valuation Method: The Case of the Li River, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-14, February.
    6. Ahlheim, Michael & Neidhardt, Jan & Siepmann, Ute & Yu, Xiaomin, 2018. "WeChat - using social media for the assessment of tourist preferences for environmental improvements in China," Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 09-2018, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jenpmg:v:59:y:2016:i:1:p:22-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CJEP20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.