IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jdevst/v54y2018i2p343-358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Desirability, Opportunism and Actual Support for Farmers’ Market Organisations in Ethiopia

Author

Listed:
  • Steffen Eriksen
  • Clemens Lutz
  • Getaw Tadesse

Abstract

One of the striking issues in the literature on farmers’ market organisations (FMOs) is that farmers generally report quite positive opinions regarding the services of their FMO, while, at the same time, actual sales reveal a much more reserved attitude. We argue that farmers may feel social and/or opportunistic pressure to express positive opinions concerning the FMO, to donors and policy-makers, which are not necessarily in line with their actions. This article proposes a list experiment method to control for this bias. The method shows that especially farmers who express strong support for the FMO seriously hesitate to speak freely.

Suggested Citation

  • Steffen Eriksen & Clemens Lutz & Getaw Tadesse, 2018. "Social Desirability, Opportunism and Actual Support for Farmers’ Market Organisations in Ethiopia," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(2), pages 343-358, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:54:y:2018:i:2:p:343-358
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2017.1299138
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00220388.2017.1299138
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2017.1299138?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tadesse, Getaw & Abate, Gashaw T. & Zewdie, Tadiwos, 2020. "Biases in self-reported food insecurity measurement: A list experiment approach," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    2. Katia A. Figueroa-Rodríguez & María del Carmen Álvarez-Ávila & Fabiola Hernández Castillo & Rita Schwentesius Rindermann & Benjamín Figueroa-Sandoval, 2019. "Farmers’ Market Actors, Dynamics, and Attributes: A Bibliometric Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-15, January.
    3. Bachke, Maren Elise, 2019. "Do farmers’ organizations enhance the welfare of smallholders? Findings from the Mozambican national agricultural survey," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jdevst:v:54:y:2018:i:2:p:343-358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/FJDS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.