IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/jculte/v11y2018i3p177-192.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A good hustle: the moral economy of market competition in adult webcam modeling

Author

Listed:
  • Niels van Doorn
  • Olav Velthuis

Abstract

In this article, we examine how models working on Chaturbate, one of the world’s most popular adult webcam platforms, negotiate and make sense of the dynamic ways in which this platform configures their competitive environment. By combining different perspectives from the field of economic sociology, we demonstrate how competition on Chaturbate is shaped by various market devices whose strategic negotiation informs – and is informed by – the moral economy articulated on web forums where models gather to discuss their work experiences and market strategies. We first introduce Chaturbate and the ways in which it organizes market competition, surveying the environment models have to negotiate. We then zoom in on two controversial strategies for beating the competition, each of which upset the moral economy of Chaturbate’s model community. Subsequently, we turn to what models term ‘the hustle,’ which encompasses a number of competitive strategies and criteria judged to be fair and thus legitimate. The final part of our analysis considers the limitations of the hustle, as well as the meritocratic and entrepreneurial discourse that surround it, in light of what we identify as Chaturbate’s ‘manufactured uncertainty.’

Suggested Citation

  • Niels van Doorn & Olav Velthuis, 2018. "A good hustle: the moral economy of market competition in adult webcam modeling," Journal of Cultural Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 177-192, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:177-192
    DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2018.1446183
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/17530350.2018.1446183
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/17530350.2018.1446183?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Samantha Majic & Melissa Ditmore & Jun Li, 2024. "440 Sex Workers Cannot Be Wrong: Engaging and Negotiating Online Platform Power," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Gerassi, Lara B. & Cruys, Caro & Hendry, Nicole & del Carmen Rosales, Maria, 2024. "An Exploration of Sex Trading for Compensation and LGBTQ+ Inclusive Screening Practices: Perspectives of Young People who have Experienced Sex Trading and/or Homelessness," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Valeria Rubattu & Alicja Perdion & Belinda Brooks-Gordon, 2023. "‘Cam Girls and Adult Performers Are Enjoying a Boom in Business’: The Reportage on the Pandemic Impact on Virtual Sex Work," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-29, January.
    4. Robin Steedman & Taylor Brydges, 2023. "Hustling in the creative industries: Narratives and work practices of female filmmakers and fashion designers," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 793-809, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:jculte:v:11:y:2018:i:3:p:177-192. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RJCE20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.