IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v29y2022i2p136-185.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach

Author

Listed:
  • Susanne Beck
  • Carsten Bergenholtz
  • Marcel Bogers
  • Tiare-Maria Brasseur
  • Marie Louise Conradsen
  • Diletta Di Marco
  • Andreas P. Distel
  • Leonhard Dobusch
  • Daniel Dörler
  • Agnes Effert
  • Benedikt Fecher
  • Despoina Filiou
  • Lars Frederiksen
  • Thomas Gillier
  • Christoph Grimpe
  • Marc Gruber
  • Carolin Haeussler
  • Florian Heigl
  • Karin Hoisl
  • Katie Hyslop
  • Olga Kokshagina
  • Marcel LaFlamme
  • Cornelia Lawson
  • Hila Lifshitz-Assaf
  • Wolfgang Lukas
  • Markus Nordberg
  • Maria Theresa Norn
  • Marion Poetz
  • Marisa Ponti
  • Gernot Pruschak
  • Laia Pujol Priego
  • Agnieszka Radziwon
  • Janet Rafner
  • Gergana Romanova
  • Alexander Ruser
  • Henry Sauermann
  • Sonali K. Shah
  • Jacob F. Sherson
  • Julia Suess-Reyes
  • Christopher L. Tucci
  • Philipp Tuertscher
  • Jane Bjørn Vedel
  • Theresa Velden
  • Roberto Verganti
  • Jonathan Wareham
  • Andrea Wiggins
  • Sunny Mosangzi Xu

Abstract

Openness and collaboration in scientific research are attracting increasing attention from scholars and practitioners alike. However, a common understanding of these phenomena is hindered by disciplinary boundaries and disconnected research streams. We link dispersed knowledge on Open Innovation, Open Science, and related concepts such as Responsible Research and Innovation by proposing a unifying Open Innovation in Science (OIS) Research Framework. This framework captures the antecedents, contingencies, and consequences of open and collaborative practices along the entire process of generating and disseminating scientific insights and translating them into innovation. Moreover, it elucidates individual-, team-, organisation-, field-, and society‐level factors shaping OIS practices. To conceptualise the framework, we employed a collaborative approach involving 47 scholars from multiple disciplines, highlighting both tensions and commonalities between existing approaches. The OIS Research Framework thus serves as a basis for future research, informs policy discussions, and provides guidance to scientists and practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Susanne Beck & Carsten Bergenholtz & Marcel Bogers & Tiare-Maria Brasseur & Marie Louise Conradsen & Diletta Di Marco & Andreas P. Distel & Leonhard Dobusch & Daniel Dörler & Agnes Effert & Benedikt F, 2022. "The Open Innovation in Science research field: a collaborative conceptualisation approach," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 136-185, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:29:y:2022:i:2:p:136-185
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2020.1792274?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Beck, Susanne & Brasseur, Tiare-Maria & Poetz, Marion & Sauermann, Henry, 2022. "Crowdsourcing research questions in science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    2. McCarthy, Ian P. & Bogers, Marcel L.A.M., 2023. "The open academic: Why and how business academics should use social media to be more ‘open’ and impactful," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 153-166.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:29:y:2022:i:2:p:136-185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.