IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/indinn/v27y2020i3p235-263.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Internal barriers to innovation and university-industry cooperation among technology-based SMEs in Brazil

Author

Listed:
  • Diego R. De Moraes Silva
  • Luis Otávio Lucas
  • Nicholas S. Vonortas

Abstract

This paper investigates the association between internal barriers to innovation and the propensity of technology-based SMEs to cooperate with universities and research institutes (URIs). We examine empirically two types of internal company barriers – financial and knowledge obstacles to innovation. The data source is the latest edition of the Brazilian Innovation Survey (PINTEC). We analyse the full sample of technology-based SMEs as well as the subsamples of high-tech manufacturing companies and knowledge-intensive business services (KIBS). Financial obstacles are shown to be strongly related to the propensity of KIBS to collaborate with URIs. Knowledge obstacles are moderately related to the propensity of high-tech manufacturing SMEs to collaborate with URIs. We conclude that while URIs have other important roles in the techno-economic system, their perceived contribution to alleviating internal innovation barriers for technology-based SMEs may be less prominent than policy decision-makers in emerging economies may expect.

Suggested Citation

  • Diego R. De Moraes Silva & Luis Otávio Lucas & Nicholas S. Vonortas, 2020. "Internal barriers to innovation and university-industry cooperation among technology-based SMEs in Brazil," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(3), pages 235-263, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:27:y:2020:i:3:p:235-263
    DOI: 10.1080/13662716.2019.1576507
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13662716.2019.1576507
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13662716.2019.1576507?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Roberto Alvarez & Miguel A. Gonzalez, 2023. "Obstacles to Green Innovation: Evidence from Chilean Firms," Working Papers wp550, University of Chile, Department of Economics.
    2. Noman Arshed & Waqas Ahmad & Uzma Hanif, 2022. "A Spatial Temporal Exploration of Factors Motivating Academia-Industry Collaboration," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 521-540, March.
    3. Nsanzumuhire, Silas U. & Groot, Wim & Cabus, Sofie J. & Bizimana, Benjamin, 2021. "Understanding the extent and nature of academia-industry interactions in Rwanda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    4. Lianjie Zhou & Yuhui Dai, 2023. "Green Production Management and Innovation Nexus: Evidence from Technology-Based SMEs of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-14, March.
    5. Natália L. Figueiredo & João J. M. Ferreira, 2022. "More than meets the partner: a systematic review and agenda for University–Industry cooperation," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 72(1), pages 231-273, February.
    6. Yanping Xu & Lilong Zhu, 2022. "Pharmaceutical Enterprises’ R&D Innovation Cooperation Moran Strategy When Considering Tax Incentives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Giulia Giacomello Pompilio & Tiago F. A. C. Sigahi & Izabela Simon Rampasso & Gustavo Hermínio Salati Marcondes de Moraes & Lucas Veiga Ávila & Walter Leal Filho & Rosley Anholon, 2023. "Innovation in Brazilian Industries: Analysis of Management Practices Using Fuzzy TOPSIS," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:indinn:v:27:y:2020:i:3:p:235-263. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CIAI20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.