IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/gnstxx/v22y2010i2p257-269.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Jackknife-after-bootstrap regression influence diagnostics

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Martin
  • Steven Roberts

Abstract

We propose a bootstrap approach to gauging the size of regression influence measures. The bootstrap cut-offs generated are based on approximating the sampling distribution of the respective measures under resampling, work well for small samples, and allow for features such as asymmetric cut-offs. The bootstrap method uses Efron's jackknife-after-bootstrap idea to deal with the issue of an influential point contaminating the resamples from which cut-offs are calculated. The method is illustrated through both real-world examples and a simulation study, the results of which suggest that the bootstrap method provides a reliable alternative to traditional methods particularly in small to moderate samples.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Martin & Steven Roberts, 2010. "Jackknife-after-bootstrap regression influence diagnostics," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(2), pages 257-269.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:22:y:2010:i:2:p:257-269
    DOI: 10.1080/10485250903287906
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/10485250903287906
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/10485250903287906?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wing‐Kam Fung & Zhong‐Yi Zhu & Bo‐Cheng Wei & Xuming He, 2002. "Influence diagnostics and outlier tests for semiparametric mixed models," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 64(3), pages 565-579, August.
    2. Michael Martin & Steven Roberts, 2006. "An evaluation of bootstrap methods for outlier detection in least squares regression," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 703-720.
    3. Kim, Choongrak, 1996. "Cook's distance in spline smoothing," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 139-144, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ufuk Beyaztas & Aylin Alin, 2014. "Sufficient jackknife-after-bootstrap method for detection of influential observations in linear regression models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 55(4), pages 1001-1018, November.
    2. J. M. Muñoz-Pichardo & J. L. Moreno-Rebollo & R. Pino-Mejías & M. D. Cubiles Vega, 2019. "Influence measures in beta regression models through distance between distributions," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 103(2), pages 163-185, June.
    3. Ufuk Beyaztas & Beste H. Beyaztas, 2019. "On Jackknife-After-Bootstrap Method for Dependent Data," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 53(4), pages 1613-1632, April.
    4. Ufuk Beyaztas & Aylin Alin & Michael A. Martin, 2014. "Robust BCa-JaB method as a diagnostic tool for linear regression models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(7), pages 1593-1610, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hadi Emami, 2018. "Local influence for Liu estimators in semiparametric linear models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 529-544, June.
    2. Emami, Hadi, 2015. "Influence diagnostic in ridge semiparametric models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 106-113.
    3. Ibacache-Pulgar, Germán & Paula, Gilberto A., 2011. "Local influence for Student-t partially linear models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(3), pages 1462-1478, March.
    4. Kim, Choongrak & Park, Byeong U. & Kim, Woochul, 2002. "Influence diagnostics in semiparametric regression models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(1), pages 49-58, November.
    5. Xueying Zheng & Wing Fung & Zhongyi Zhu, 2013. "Robust estimation in joint mean–covariance regression model for longitudinal data," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 65(4), pages 617-638, August.
    6. Whasoo Bae & Soonyoung Hwang & Choongrak Kim, 2008. "Influence diagnostics in the varying coefficient model with longitudinal data," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 185-196, April.
    7. Kim, Choongrak & Lee, Yonjoo & Park, Byeong U., 2001. "Cook's distance in local polynomial regression," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 54(1), pages 33-40, August.
    8. Wei, Wen Hsiang, 2004. "Derivatives diagnostics and robustness for smoothing splines," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 335-356, June.
    9. Liya Fu & Zhuoran Yang & Fengjing Cai & You-Gan Wang, 2021. "Efficient and doubly-robust methods for variable selection and parameter estimation in longitudinal data analysis," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 36(2), pages 781-804, June.
    10. M. P. Wand, 2003. "Smoothing and mixed models," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 223-249, July.
    11. Li, Zaixing & Xu, Wangli & Zhu, Lixing, 2009. "Influence diagnostics and outlier tests for varying coefficient mixed models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 100(9), pages 2002-2017, October.
    12. Zeller, Camila B. & Labra, Filidor V. & Lachos, Victor H. & Balakrishnan, N., 2010. "Influence analyses of skew-normal/independent linear mixed models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 54(5), pages 1266-1280, May.
    13. Xibin Zhang & Maxwell L. King, 2002. "Influence Diagnostics in GARCH Processes," Monash Econometrics and Business Statistics Working Papers 19/02, Monash University, Department of Econometrics and Business Statistics.
    14. Germán Ibacache-Pulgar & Gilberto Paula & Francisco Cysneiros, 2013. "Semiparametric additive models under symmetric distributions," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 22(1), pages 103-121, March.
    15. Fan, Yali & Qin, Guoyou & Zhu, Zhongyi, 2012. "Variable selection in robust regression models for longitudinal data," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 156-167.
    16. Germán Ibacache-Pulgar & Cristian Villegas & Javier Linkolk López-Gonzales & Magaly Moraga, 2023. "Influence measures in nonparametric regression model with symmetric random errors," Statistical Methods & Applications, Springer;Società Italiana di Statistica, vol. 32(1), pages 1-25, March.
    17. Ping Chen & Jing Yang & Linyuan Li, 2015. "Synthetic detection of change point and outliers in bilinear time series models," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(2), pages 284-293, January.
    18. Vanegas, Luis Hernando & Rondón, Luz Marina & Cysneiros, Francisco José A., 2012. "Diagnostic procedures in Birnbaum–Saunders nonlinear regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 56(6), pages 1662-1680.
    19. Xie, Feng-Chang & Wei, Bo-Cheng, 2007. "Diagnostics analysis for log-Birnbaum-Saunders regression models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(9), pages 4692-4706, May.
    20. Xu, Liang & Lee, Sik-Yum & Poon, Wai-Yin, 2006. "Deletion measures for generalized linear mixed effects models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(2), pages 1131-1146, November.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:gnstxx:v:22:y:2010:i:2:p:257-269. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/GNST20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.