IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v27y2019i11p2288-2311.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Economic resilience of metropolitan, old industrial, and rural regions in two subsequent recessionary shocks

Author

Listed:
  • Jan Ženka
  • Ondřej Slach
  • Adam Pavlík

Abstract

In this paper, we focus on the question of how particular types of regions react to economic shocks. Drawing on a case study of Czech microregions, we aim to determine if the old industrial regions differ significantly from other types of regions (metropolitan, urban, rural) in (post)crisis economic development. Two aspects of regional resilience (measured by unemployment growth) were considered: recession and recovery. We focused on the comparison of two subsequent recessionary shocks: the 2008–2010 global recession and the 2012–2013 austerity crisis. Metropolitan regions showed relatively stable economic development. Old industrial regions were more resilient than expected. Rural regions exhibited highly diverse reactions: lower resistance was characteristic for regions specialized (mostly) in automotive and some labour-intensive industries. The first wave of recession increased unemployment mostly in (rural) regions dependent on export-oriented manufacturing, the second wave especially hit larger cities with metropolitan functions. Regions that experienced a sharp unemployment increase in the first recession were generally more resistant in the second wave. All types of regions were internally highly diverse in their reactions to economic crises, which points to the importance of micro-regional variations of economic resilience, the performance of individual local firms and subsidiaries, and extra-regional factors of regional development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jan Ženka & Ondřej Slach & Adam Pavlík, 2019. "Economic resilience of metropolitan, old industrial, and rural regions in two subsequent recessionary shocks," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(11), pages 2288-2311, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:27:y:2019:i:11:p:2288-2311
    DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2019.1638346
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654313.2019.1638346
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654313.2019.1638346?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dominik Porczyński & Dariusz Wojakowski, 2020. "Borderlands from the resilience perspective: Diversification of state borders in former Austrian Galicia," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 12(5), pages 793-813, October.
    2. Seoyoung Yu & Donghyun Kim, 2021. "Changes in Regional Economic Resilience after the 2008 Global Economic Crisis: The Case of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Liangang Li & Pingyu Zhang & Chengxin Wang, 2022. "What Affects the Economic Resilience of China’s Yellow River Basin Amid Economic Crisis—From the Perspective of Spatial Heterogeneity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Jan Ženka & Marcela Chreneková & Lucie Kokešová & Veronika Svetlíková, 2021. "Industrial Structure and Economic Resilience of Non-Metropolitan Regions: An Empirical Base for the Smart Specialization Policies," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-21, December.
    5. Kayla Stan & Graham A. Watt & Arturo Sanchez-Azofeifa, 2021. "Financial stability in response to climate change in a northern temperate economy," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    6. Johnston Richard & Hogg Ryan & Miller Kristel, 2021. "Who is Most Vulnerable? Exploring Job Vulnerability, Social Distancing and Demand During COVID-19," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 40(2), pages 100-142, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:27:y:2019:i:11:p:2288-2311. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.