IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v11y2003i3p341-350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Cruise Industry and Port City Regeneration: The Case of Valletta

Author

Listed:
  • JOHN MCCARTHY

Abstract

Port cities in the Mediterranean and elsewhere are increasingly seeking to encourage tourism-related development, and the cruise industry is a significant potential source of revenue for such cities. Consequently, there is competition between port cities for infrastructure that allows increased cruise tourism, and many cities have encouraged the development of new cruise passenger terminal facilities. While such schemes have clear economic benefits, there are associated problems that may become evident only in the medium- or long-term. The case of the Valletta Waterfront Project illustrates a range of resulting issues and tensions, and indicates the need to more sensitively evaluate cruise tourism-related development proposals.

Suggested Citation

  • John Mccarthy, 2003. "The Cruise Industry and Port City Regeneration: The Case of Valletta," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 341-350.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:11:y:2003:i:3:p:341-350
    DOI: 10.1080/09654310303634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654310303634
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654310303634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María J. Andrade & João Pedro Costa & Eduardo Jiménez-Morales, 2021. "Challenges for European Tourist-City-Ports: Strategies for a Sustainable Coexistence in the Cruise Post-COVID Context," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-20, November.
    2. Koi Yu Adolf Ng & César Ducruet, 2014. "The changing tides of port geography (1950–2012)," Post-Print halshs-01359160, HAL.
    3. María J. Andrade & João Pedro Costa & Eduardo Jiménez-Morales & Jonathan Ruiz-Jaramillo, 2021. "A City Profile of Malaga: The Role of the Port-City Border throughout Historical Transformations," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(3), pages 105-118.
    4. Rosa-Jiménez, Carlos & Perea-Medina, Beatriz & Andrade, María J. & Nebot, Nuria, 2018. "An examination of the territorial imbalance of the cruising activity in the main Mediterranean port destinations: Effects on sustainable transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 94-101.
    5. Nataša Danilović Hristić & Nebojša Stefanović & Saša Milijić, 2020. "Danube River Cruises as a Strategy for Representing Historical Heritage and Developing Cultural Tourism in Serbia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Olivier Dehoorne & Nathalie Petit-Charles, 2011. "Cruise tourism and Cruise Industry [Tourisme de croisière et industrie de la croisière]," Post-Print hal-01368511, HAL.
    7. Wang, Haizhuang, 2014. "Preliminary investigation of waterfront redevelopment in Chinese coastal port cities: the case of the eastern Dalian port areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 29-42.
    8. Chapman, Anya & Speake, Janet, 2011. "Regeneration in a mass-tourism resort: The changing fortunes of Bugibba, Malta," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 482-491.
    9. Wang, Ying & Jung, Kyung-Ae & Yeo, Gi-Tae & Chou, Chien-Chang, 2014. "Selecting a cruise port of call location using the fuzzy-AHP method: A case study in East Asia," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 262-270.
    10. Irina Svaetichin & Tommi Inkinen, 2017. "Port Waste Management in the Baltic Sea Area: A Four Port Study on the Legal Requirements, Processes and Collaboration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:11:y:2003:i:3:p:341-350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.