IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eurpls/v10y2002i2p233-250.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovation Advantages of Cities: From Knowledge to Equity in Five Basic Steps

Author

Listed:
  • Philip Cooke
  • Clare Davies
  • Rob Wilson

Abstract

This paper explores the reasons why cities are often major centres of innovation, even in some less favoured regions and countries. It starts with an anatomization of the dominant factors that explain why key less favoured settings developed 'new economy' clusters through institutional interaction with Silicon Valley. The analysis concludes that public research resources and private commercialization funding are central, supported by a wide array of private but few public innovation support services. It then examines a number of cases from cities in less favoured regions and countries where innovation has occurred. The conclusions are that the research-venture capital model is present and explains innovation in each case. However, in some cases public venture capital has to substitute for private due to market failure, or a phenomenon termed 'Silicon Valley Offshore' has been induced. Cities are innovative where they concentrate the desired scientific and investment knowledge capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Philip Cooke & Clare Davies & Rob Wilson, 2002. "Innovation Advantages of Cities: From Knowledge to Equity in Five Basic Steps," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 233-250, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:10:y:2002:i:2:p:233-250
    DOI: 10.1080/09654310120114517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09654310120114517
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09654310120114517?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pina, Katia & Tether, Bruce S., 2016. "Towards understanding variety in knowledge intensive business services by distinguishing their knowledge bases," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 401-413.
    2. Hwajin Lim & Tetsuo Kidokoro, 2017. "Comparing a spatial structure of innovation network between Korea and Japan: through the analysis of co-inventors’ network," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 133-153, April.
    3. Hammer, Andrea, 2014. "Innovation of knowledge intensive service firms in urban areas," Working Paper Series in Economics 63, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Department of Economics and Management.
    4. Alberto Di Minin, 2004. "Innovation in peripheral economies: the case of Pisa," Working Papers 200401, Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna of Pisa, Istituto di Management.
    5. Mikel Navarro & Juan José Gibaja & Beñat Bilbao-Osorio & Ricardo Aguado, 2009. "Patterns of Innovation in EU-25 Regions: A Typology and Policy Recommendations," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 27(5), pages 815-840, October.
    6. Jan Öhman, 2010. "Towards a Digital (Societal) Infrastructure?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 47(1), pages 183-195, January.
    7. Edward J Malecki, 2007. "Cities and Regions Competing in the Global Economy: Knowledge and Local Development Policies," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 25(5), pages 638-654, October.
    8. Anna Gervasoni & Cristina De Silva & Michele Lertora & Andrea Odille Bosio, 2022. "Venture Capital for the development of smart cities: the Italian case," LIUC Papers in Economics 2022-13, Cattaneo University (LIUC).
    9. Jochen Monstadt, 2009. "Conceptualizing the Political Ecology of Urban Infrastructures: Insights from Technology and Urban Studies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(8), pages 1924-1942, August.
    10. Yannis Pierrakis & George Saridakis, 2019. "The role of venture capitalists in the regional innovation ecosystem: a comparison of networking patterns between private and publicly backed venture capital funds," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(3), pages 850-873, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eurpls:v:10:y:2002:i:2:p:233-250. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CEPS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.