IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Employees, Non-financial Reports and Institutional Arrangements: A Study of Accounts in the Workplace

Listed author(s):
  • Thomas Riise Johansen
Registered author(s):

    Non-financial reports, such as sustainability, social responsibility and ethical reports, claim to make organizations accountable to a range of stakeholders. Yet, it has been argued that such reports are of limited value in the absence of structures that enable stakeholder response to the information provided and accordingly influence decision-making. The aim of this paper is to assess the materiality of non-financial reports to employees in the light of enterprise-level arrangements where employees potentially impact decision-making. The paper draws on interviews with Danish employee representatives and archival material in organizations that claim to be accountable to a range of stakeholders, including employees, through the preparation of non-financial reports. Denmark is an interesting empirical setting for this study as arrangements such as European works councils, employee board representatives, works councils and shop stewards are widespread and regulated. This paper suggests that, from the perspective of employees, formal reports represent a limited contribution to accountability and that institutional arrangements in the workplace appear more important for this stakeholder group. The paper illustrates that these arrangements are significant vehicles for employees to demand, receive and develop accounts of organizational affairs and that non-financial reports seem insignificant as a basis for pursuing impact on management decision-making.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal European Accounting Review.

    Volume (Year): 19 (2010)
    Issue (Month): 1 ()
    Pages: 97-130

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:97-130
    DOI: 10.1080/09638180902989392
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Web:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:euract:v:19:y:2010:i:1:p:97-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Chris Longhurst)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.