IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/eujhet/v21y2014i1p107-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carl Menger's theory of money's origins: Responding to revisionism

Author

Listed:
  • Alla Semenova

Abstract

This article disputes the validity of the revisionist accounts of Carl Menger's theory of money's origins. While Menger's monetary thought underwent a complicated process of development and his later works reflected new Chartalist insights, Menger never escaped the theoretical framework of the spontaneous origins of the monetary unit, devoid of any action or intervention by the state. The role of the state in Menger's monetary theory was always confined to the later stages of money's development. While Menger once admitted a possibility of money's origins by the influence of public authority, he never incorporated it into his overall theoretical framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Alla Semenova, 2014. "Carl Menger's theory of money's origins: Responding to revisionism," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(1), pages 107-141, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:21:y:2014:i:1:p:107-141
    DOI: 10.1080/09672567.2012.683017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/09672567.2012.683017
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/09672567.2012.683017?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. L. Randall Wray, 1998. "Understanding Modern Money," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1668.
    2. Knapp, Georg Friedrich, 1924. "The State Theory of Money," History of Economic Thought Books, McMaster University Archive for the History of Economic Thought, number knapp1924.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. van 't Klooster, Jens & Assistant, JHET, 2020. "Marginalism and Scope in the Early Methodenstreit," OSF Preprints aq2bz, Center for Open Science.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. L. Randall Wray, 2012. "Keynes after 75 Years: Rethinking Money as a Public Monopoly," Chapters, in: Thomas Cate (ed.), Keynes’s General Theory, chapter 15, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Pavlina R. Tcherneva, 2008. "The Return of Fiscal Policy: Can the New Developments in the New Economic Consensus Be Reconciled with the Post-Keynesian View?," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_539, Levy Economics Institute.
    3. Phil Armstrong, 2020. "Can Heterodox Economics Make a Difference?," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 19964.
    4. Zdravka Todorova, 2013. "Connecting social provisioning and functional finance in a post-Keynesian–Institutional analysis of the public sector," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 61-75.
    5. Thomas Cate (ed.), 2012. "Keynes’s General Theory," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 3855.
    6. Thomas I. Palley, 2015. "Money, Fiscal Policy, and Interest Rates: A Critique of Modern Monetary Theory," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(1), pages 1-23, January.
    7. Alla Semenova & L. Randall Wray, 2015. "The Rise of Money and Class Society: The Contributions of John F. Henry," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_832, Levy Economics Institute.
    8. Ryan S. Mattson & Rex Pjesky, 2019. "Approaching Modern Monetary Theory with a Taylor Rule," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, September.
    9. Soldatos Gerasimos T., 2018. "Property Rights on Credit and State Control of Money: The Irrelevance of the Origin of Money," The Economists' Voice, De Gruyter, vol. 15(1), pages 1-5, December.
    10. Zdravka Todorova, 2007. "Deficits and Institutional Theorizing about Households and the State," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(2), pages 575-582, June.
    11. Thomas Palley, 2018. "The Evolution of money debate: functionalism versus chartalism, Schumpeterian dynamics, Gresham's fallacy, and how history constrains public finance," FMM Working Paper 34-2018, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
    12. Eric Tymoigne, 2017. "On the Centrality of Redemption: Linking the State and Credit Theories of Money through a Financial Approach to Money," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_890, Levy Economics Institute.
    13. Michael Beggs, 2017. "The state as a creature of money," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(5), pages 463-477, September.
    14. Garzón Espinosa, Eduardo & Cruz Hidalgo, Esteban & Medialdea Garcia, Bibiana & Sanchez Mato, Carlos, 2023. "Money or Crypto-Gold? Problematics and Possible Worlds for Cryptocurrencies," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 76(3), pages 429-452.
    15. Robert S. Kravchuk, 2020. "Post‐Keynesian Public Budgeting & Finance: Assessing Contributions From Modern Monetary Theory," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 95-123, September.
    16. Jussi Ahokas, 2012. "Geographies of Monetary Economy and the European economic crisis," ERSA conference papers ersa12p437, European Regional Science Association.
    17. L. Randall Wray, 2020. "Sovereign Currency and Non‐Sovereign Budgets: The Modern Money Theory Approach," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(3), pages 26-48, September.
    18. L. Randall Wray, 2013. "Is there room for bulls, bears and States in the circuit?," Chapters, in: Louis-Philippe Rochon & Mario Seccareccia (ed.), Monetary Economies of Production, chapter 6, pages 54-70, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    19. Alexander W. Salter & William J. Luther, 2014. "Synthesizing State and Spontaneous Order Theories of Money," Advances in Austrian Economics, in: Entangled Political Economy, volume 18, pages 161-178, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    20. Reynold F. Nesiba, 2013. "Do Institutionalists and post-Keynesians share a common approach to Modern Monetary Theory (MMT)?," European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 10(1), pages 44-60.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:eujhet:v:21:y:2014:i:1:p:107-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/REJH20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.