IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cityxx/v7y2003i2p199-211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The limits to contemporary urban redevelopment 'Doing’ entrepreneurial urbanism in Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester

Author

Listed:
  • Kevin Ward

Abstract

Since the early 1970s there has been a series of economic and political transitions in the governance of the older industrialized cities of the global north. Grouped together, and commonly referred to as an entrepreneurial 'turn’, this series of discrete but interlocking shifts in how the state intervenes and frames urban governance reveals much about the emergent geographies of neo‐liberalization. Nation states have codified the inter‐urban competition endemic in contemporary capitalism, building upon and reinforcing, rather than ameliorating, uneven economic development. Cities have thus been placed squarely in the front line of delivering national competitiveness. This is in sharp contrast to earlier representations of cities as relics of industrial glories and as financial drains on the nation's resources. In light of this changing portrayal, and building on earlier debates in CITY, this paper draws upon research in Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester to question how the meaning of 'urban redevelopment’ has been re‐constituted in recent years, and in doing so it draws attention to what this might mean for issues of rights to the city.

Suggested Citation

  • Kevin Ward, 2003. "The limits to contemporary urban redevelopment 'Doing’ entrepreneurial urbanism in Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 199-211, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:7:y:2003:i:2:p:199-211
    DOI: 10.1080/1360481032000136778
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1360481032000136778
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/1360481032000136778?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ian R. Cook & Kevin Ward, 2011. "Trans-urban Networks of Learning, Mega Events and Policy Tourism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2519-2535, September.
    2. Randy Lippert & Mark Sleiman, 2012. "Ambassadors, Business Improvement District Governance and Knowledge of the Urban," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 61-76, January.
    3. Thierry Theurillat, 2011. "La ville négociée : entre financiarisation et durabilité," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 13(3), pages 225-254.
    4. Brett Christophers, 2008. "The BBC, the Creative Class, and Neoliberal Urbanism in the North of England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(10), pages 2313-2329, October.
    5. Alistair Kefford, 2021. "Actually existing managerialism: Planning, politics and property development in post-1945 Britain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2441-2455, September.
    6. Iain Deas & Stephen Hincks & Nicola Headlam, 2013. "Explicitly permissive? Understanding actor interrelationships in the governance of economic development: The experience of England’s Local Enterprise Partnerships," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 718-737, November.
    7. Yanpeng Jiang & Paul Waley, 2020. "Who Builds Cities in China? How Urban Investment and Development Companies Have Transformed Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 636-651, July.
    8. Steven Henderson, 2010. "Developer Collaboration in Urban Land Development: Partnership Working in Paddington, London," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(1), pages 165-185, February.
    9. Nils Hertting & Catharina Thörn & Mats Franzén, 2022. "NORMALIZING URBAN ENTREPRENEURIALISM THROUGH SLY DE‐POLITICIZATION: City Centre Development in Gothenburg and Stockholm," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 253-268, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cityxx:v:7:y:2003:i:2:p:199-211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/CCIT20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.