IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/urbstu/v49y2012i1p61-76.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ambassadors, Business Improvement District Governance and Knowledge of the Urban

Author

Listed:
  • Randy Lippert
  • Mark Sleiman

Abstract

This article explores practices of uniformed, mobile ‘hospitality’ teams called ambassadors in Canadian downtown cores through document analysis and in-depth interviews with ambassadors, police and business improvement district (BID) personnel. The study reveals how ambassadors conduct surveillance and produce knowledge to remake downtowns for a consumption-oriented order, the institutions to which knowledge is transferred and for what purposes. The paper argues that the significance of ambassadors in downtown cores cannot be reduced to a physical security function. Rather, ambassadors’ scope is broader and reflects BIDs’ peculiar and precarious institutional position in urban governance, one that is highly dependent on knowledge for shaping and encouraging downtown consumption, justifying practices to its mandatory membership and board, and persuading other institutions to do its bidding.

Suggested Citation

  • Randy Lippert & Mark Sleiman, 2012. "Ambassadors, Business Improvement District Governance and Knowledge of the Urban," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 49(1), pages 61-76, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:49:y:2012:i:1:p:61-76
    DOI: 10.1177/0042098010396235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098010396235
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/0042098010396235?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kevin Ward, 2003. "The limits to contemporary urban redevelopment 'Doing’ entrepreneurial urbanism in Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester," City, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 7(2), pages 199-211, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alistair Kefford, 2021. "Actually existing managerialism: Planning, politics and property development in post-1945 Britain," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(12), pages 2441-2455, September.
    2. Nils Hertting & Catharina Thörn & Mats Franzén, 2022. "NORMALIZING URBAN ENTREPRENEURIALISM THROUGH SLY DE‐POLITICIZATION: City Centre Development in Gothenburg and Stockholm," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(2), pages 253-268, March.
    3. Brett Christophers, 2008. "The BBC, the Creative Class, and Neoliberal Urbanism in the North of England," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 40(10), pages 2313-2329, October.
    4. Iain Deas & Stephen Hincks & Nicola Headlam, 2013. "Explicitly permissive? Understanding actor interrelationships in the governance of economic development: The experience of England’s Local Enterprise Partnerships," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 28(7-8), pages 718-737, November.
    5. Steven Henderson, 2010. "Developer Collaboration in Urban Land Development: Partnership Working in Paddington, London," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 28(1), pages 165-185, February.
    6. Thierry Theurillat, 2011. "La ville négociée : entre financiarisation et durabilité," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 13(3), pages 225-254.
    7. Ian R. Cook & Kevin Ward, 2011. "Trans-urban Networks of Learning, Mega Events and Policy Tourism," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 48(12), pages 2519-2535, September.
    8. Yanpeng Jiang & Paul Waley, 2020. "Who Builds Cities in China? How Urban Investment and Development Companies Have Transformed Shanghai," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 636-651, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:49:y:2012:i:1:p:61-76. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.gla.ac.uk/departments/urbanstudiesjournal .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.