IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/cdipxx/v6y1996i1p6-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation

Author

Listed:
  • Sarah C White

Abstract

Participation must be seen as political. There are always tensions underlying issues such as who is involved, how, and on whose terms. While participation has the potential to challenge patterns of dominance, it may also be the means through which existing power relations are entrenched and reproduced. The arenas in which people perceive their interests and judge whether they can express them are not neutral. Participation may take place for a whole range of unfree reasons. It is important to see participation as a dynamic process, and to understand that its own form and function can become a focus for struggle.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarah C White, 1996. "Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(1), pages 6-15.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:6:y:1996:i:1:p:6-15
    DOI: 10.1080/0961452961000157564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/0961452961000157564
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/0961452961000157564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Emadul Islam & Haris Bin Abd Wahab & Odessa Gonzalez Benson, 2022. "Community Participation in Disaster Recovery Programs: A Study of a Coastal Area in Bangladesh," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(5), pages 2438-2462, October.
    2. Alexis Beyuo & Nana Akua Anyidoho, 2022. "An Impact Assessment of Farmer Participation on Food Security in Northwestern Ghana," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 34(4), pages 1831-1856, August.
    3. Małgorzata Marks-Krzyszkowska & Krystyna Dzwonkowska-Godula & Anna Miklaszewska, 2022. "Types of Rural Residents in Central Poland in Terms of Their Local Participation: The Perspectives of the Local Authorities and the Inhabitants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-25, October.
    4. Beaulieu, Antoine & Leblond, Jean-Philippe & Déry, Steve & Cao, Huhua, 2023. "Urban air pollution anxieties, forest conservation, and farmland expropriation: State territorialization in the uplands and highlands of northern Thailand," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Yunjeong Yang, 2022. "Empowering or managing the locals? Within‐organizational power relations and capacity building of Korean NGOs in Cambodia," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 1130-1144, August.
    6. Diep Thanh Tung & Le Thi Thu Diem & Do Xuan Luan & Nguyen Hoang Khanh Linh, 2022. "The National Target Program for New Rural Development in Vietnam: An Understanding of People’s Participation and Its Determinants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Daniel Abrahams, 2022. "Lessons in a bottle: The outsized impacts of soda in development practice," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(6), pages 1071-1085, August.
    8. Corrine Cash, 2021. "Creating the Conditions for Climate Resilience: A Community-Based Approach in Canumay East, Philippines," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 6(4), pages 298-308.
    9. Ho, Serene & Choudhury, Pranab R. & Joshi, Richa, 2023. "Community participation for inclusive land administration: A case study of the Odisha urban slum formalization project," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:cdipxx:v:6:y:1996:i:1:p:6-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/cdip .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.