A Note on the Suboptimality of Path-Dependent Pay-Offs in Levy Markets
Cox and Leland used techniques from the field of stochastic control theory to show that, in the particular case of a Brownian motion for the asset log-returns, risk-averse decision makers with a fixed investment horizon prefer path-independent pay-offs over path-dependent pay-offs. In this note we provide a novel and simple proof for the Cox and Leland result and we will extend it to general Levy markets where pricing is based on the Esscher transform (exponential tilting). It is also shown that, in these markets, optimal path-independent pay-offs are increasing with the underlying final asset value. We provide examples that allow explicit verification of our theoretical findings and also show that the inefficiency cost of path-dependent pay-offs can be significant. Our results indicate that path-dependent investment pay-offs, the use of which is widespread in financial markets, do not offer good value from the investor's point of view.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 16 (2009)
Issue (Month): 4 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAMF20|
|Order Information:||Web: http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/RAMF20|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apmtfi:v:16:y:2009:i:4:p:315-330. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.