IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Australian industry beta risk, the choice of market index and business cycles

Listed author(s):
  • Vanitha Ragunathan
  • Robert Faff
  • Robert Brooks

The paper presents an investigation of the equity beta risk of 23 Australian industry portfolios over the period 1974 to 1992. A comparison of domestic and international market model betas, favours the domestic risk measures, although the international counterparts are generally statistically significant relative to a world market index. Furthermore, the international betas seem to display greater instability than the domestic beta estimates. Tests are made to determine whether business cycles, both domestic and international, impact upon stock returns, via changes in the estimated domestic beta. Generally, it is found that business cycles are important and that the US business cycle has a much larger impact on the equity betas of industry portfolios, than does the Australian business cycle. Finally, it is found that interactions between the business cycles of Australia and the United States, have an impact on the beta risk for many industries.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

Article provided by Taylor & Francis Journals in its journal Applied Financial Economics.

Volume (Year): 10 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 ()
Pages: 49-58

in new window

Handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:10:y:2000:i:1:p:49-58
DOI: 10.1080/096031000331923
Contact details of provider: Web page:

Order Information: Web:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apfiec:v:10:y:2000:i:1:p:49-58. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Michael McNulty)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.