IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v9y2002i6p397-406.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Classification of agricultural enterprises by their financial standing

Author

Listed:
  • D. Epstein
  • P. Tillack

Abstract

Since 1994 the majority of Russian agricultural enterprises have been unprofitable, and have accumulated large liabilities. Their reorganization and liability restructuring is necessary. However, the differences in the financial standing of enterprises should be identified and taken into consideration. Here arises an important methodological task: to choose relevant studies, i.e. criteria for enterprise selection and classification by qualitatively different groups depending upon their financial and economic standing. This is a complex and still unsolved task. This article offers to evaluate the financial standing of an unprofitable enterprise by means of the ratio of the sufficiency coefficient to cover factor costs (K1). Factor costs are determined as a sum of labour costs, depreciation deductions and land costs. K1 enables one to evaluate the ability to preserve basic factors of production. K2 and K3 ratios, which make it possible to account for enterprise ability to survive by means of minimization of depreciation deductions and accumulation of accounts payable, are composed similarly. The ratios between enterprise liability levels and different asset components are also offered, and these make it possible to classify the enterprises by their liability level. Experimental confirmation of the developed scheme were performed with the figures of agricultural enterprises of the Leningrad Region (Oblast) for 1998. These enterprises were classified into five groups. Different approaches to their reorganization were offered.

Suggested Citation

  • D. Epstein & P. Tillack, 2002. "Classification of agricultural enterprises by their financial standing," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(6), pages 397-406.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:9:y:2002:i:6:p:397-406
    DOI: 10.1080/13504850110086071
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1080/13504850110086071&magic=repec&7C&7C8674ECAB8BB840C6AD35DC6213A474B5
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504850110086071?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pederson, Glenn D. & Brooks, Karen M. & Lekhtman, Oleg P., 1998. "Russian Farm Enterprise Performance And Restructuring: A Debt Problem Or A Profitability Problem?," Working Papers 14416, University of Minnesota, Center for International Food and Agricultural Policy.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bezlepkina, Irina V. & Huirne, Ruud B.M. & Oude Lansink, Alfons G.J.M. & Oskam, Arie J., 2005. "Analysing Variation in Russian Dairy Farms, 1990-2001," 94th Seminar, April 9-10, 2005, Ashford, UK 24444, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    2. Irina V. Bezlepkina & Nikolai M. Svetlov, 2000. "Approaching the losses caused by imperfect short-term financing at the Russian farms," Econometrics 0004006, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Petrick, Martin & Ditges, C. Markus, 2000. "Risk In Agriculture As Impediment To Rural Lending - The Case Of North-Western Kazakhstan," IAMO Discussion Papers 14939, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    4. Scott Rozelle & Johan F.M. Swinnen, 2004. "Success and Failure of Reform: Insights from the Transition of Agriculture," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 42(2), pages 404-456, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:9:y:2002:i:6:p:397-406. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.