IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/apeclt/v29y2022i10p955-958.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does eliminating benefit eligibility requirements improve unemployed job search and labour market outcomes?

Author

Listed:
  • Ruud Gerards
  • Riccardo Welters

Abstract

Benefit eligibility requirements intend to incentivize the unemployed to find work more quickly. Our results, in an Australian context, suggest that those subjected to benefit eligibility requirements, despite searching at least as hard, take longer to find employment. Moreover, they spend less time in employment in the first twelve months and, if employed, have jobs with lower wages and fewer hours compared to otherwise similar unemployed without benefit eligibility requirements. Our findings are consistent with cognitive theories that emphasize that benefit eligibility requirements externalize job search motivation and increase stress, both of which reduce employment search effectiveness.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruud Gerards & Riccardo Welters, 2022. "Does eliminating benefit eligibility requirements improve unemployed job search and labour market outcomes?," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(10), pages 955-958, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:29:y:2022:i:10:p:955-958
    DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2021.1927960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/13504851.2021.1927960
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/13504851.2021.1927960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:apeclt:v:29:y:2022:i:10:p:955-958. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/RAEL20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.