IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ssi/jouird/v5y2023i4p115-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Building tomorrow: additive manufacturing unleashing sustainable progress in the US military

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela-Elena Hrab

    (National Defense University "Carol I", Romania)

  • Gheorghe Minculete

    ("Nicolae Balcescu" Land Forces Academy, Romania)

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) has recently attracted the attention of academia and private companies, viewing it as a tool for achieving sustainability within the context of sustainable development (SD). As the previous studies revealed an ongoing debate on the sustainable nature of AM, making it challenging to conclude, the primary objective of this article is to explore new perspectives that enhance the contribution of AM to the sustainability vision. Given the limited number of studies considering the potential contribution of AM to specific Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and associated targets, this research aims to complete the existing body of knowledge through an in-depth analysis. Furthermore, recognizing that AM could generate some unsustainable effects from a security standpoint, this study investigates how the military organization, with its capacity to mitigate such concerns, could contribute to implementing specific SDGs and targets through AM small and large-scale adoption. Therefore, the study follows a qualitative approach, studying the case of the American military forces in an attempt to reveal the main reasons for adopting AM and the possible contribution to specific SDGs and targets. The results highlight a consistent potential for the US military to contribute to SD, mainly through the large-scale adoption of AM. This measure could reduce their military logistic footprint and provide financial, operational and strategic advantages. While the main findings are presented in a detailed list which supports these conclusions and offers valuable lessons learned, it is essential to acknowledge the limitations of this research – namely, the lack of quantitative evidence. Therefore, to formulate a conclusive judgment on the sustainable nature of AM, future studies should concentrate on assessing financial data from private and public entities, including military organizations.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela-Elena Hrab & Gheorghe Minculete, 2023. "Building tomorrow: additive manufacturing unleashing sustainable progress in the US military," Insights into Regional Development, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 5(4), pages 115-134, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:5:y:2023:i:4:p:115-134
    DOI: 10.9770/IRD.2023.5.4(8)
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/ird/uploads/articles/20/Hrab_Building_tomorrow_additive_manufacturing_unleashing_sustainable_progress_in_the_US_military.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://jssidoi.org/ird/article/150
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.9770/IRD.2023.5.4(8)?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    additive manufacturing; sustainability; Sustainable Development Goals; targets; U.S.; military;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • H56 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - National Security and War
    • L60 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - General
    • O51 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - U.S.; Canada
    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • Q53 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Air Pollution; Water Pollution; Noise; Hazardous Waste; Solid Waste; Recycling
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ssi:jouird:v:5:y:2023:i:4:p:115-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manuela Tvaronaviciene (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.