IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/wirtsc/v99y2019i3d10.1007_s10273-019-2418-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bildungsföderalismus in Deutschland
[Educational Federalism in Germany–Financial Evaluation of the Constitutional Law Amendment]

Author

Listed:
  • Thomas Lenk

    (Universität Leipzig)

  • Philipp Glinka

    (Universität Leipzig)

  • Mario Hesse

    (Universität Leipzig)

Abstract

Das deutsche Bildungßsystem steht unter enormem Veränderungsdruck. Um die Schulen auf die Zukunft vorzubereiten und große Investitionsprogramme zu ermöglichen, haben Bund und Länder beschlossen, das Grundgesetz zu ändern. Dazu gehört auch die Öffnung von Artikel 104c. Der Bund wird künftig berechtigt sein, umfangreich in die lokale Bildungsinfrastruktur bzw. in Schulen zu investieren. Bislang waren solche Finanzhilfen stark eingeschränkt. Dies hat eine grundlegende Debatte über den Föderalismus in Deutschland und das Einflussverhältnis zwischen Bund und Ländern ausgelöst. Die Analyse der legislativen Änderung von Artikel 104c nach finanzwissenschaftlichen Kriterien zeigt, dass die politische Entscheidung kritisch bewertet werden muss.

Suggested Citation

  • Thomas Lenk & Philipp Glinka & Mario Hesse, 2019. "Bildungsföderalismus in Deutschland [Educational Federalism in Germany–Financial Evaluation of the Constitutional Law Amendment]," Wirtschaftsdienst, Springer;ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 99(3), pages 196-202, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:99:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10273-019-2418-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10273-019-2418-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10273-019-2418-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10273-019-2418-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ludger Wößmann & Vera Freundl & Elisabeth Grewenig & Philipp Lergetporer & Katharina Werner, 2020. "Deutsche sind für mehr Einheitlichkeit und Vergleichbarkeit im Bildungssystem – Ergebnisse des ifo Bildungsbarometers 2020," ifo Schnelldienst, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, vol. 73(09), pages 40-48, September.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • I22 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Educational Finance; Financial Aid
    • H73 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:wirtsc:v:99:y:2019:i:3:d:10.1007_s10273-019-2418-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.