IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v35y2022i4d10.1007_s11213-021-09583-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Practical Action Research of Portfolio Assessment on Building the Learning Community for Graduate Students in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Joni Tzuchen Tang

    (National Taiwan University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

Graduate schools often limit their courses in certain professional areas of the department, lacking cross-discipline, and facing the challenges of integrating with the industry’s practical applications. This study is to overcome the problems in the ideology of “Learning Community” and “Portfolio Assessment,” by the method of Teacher’s Action Research. We designed the research as two phases in a graduate class where most are interdisciplinary students. In the first phase, we focused on 11 students as research objects, and in the second phase, after fixing the curriculum direction, we focused on 7 students. This research found three results: 1. through the learning process, everyone, including the cross-disciplinary students, all have transformed from the beginning of an unfamiliar curriculum to the end that they can create works and conduct early childhood teaching experiments. 2. In the self-assessment form, participating students agreed that the curriculum model cultivated their “local-links” skills. 3. The curriculum helped students to integrate their abilities to implement a children’s digital game. Besides, by researching the network of families, schools, and communities, they can thoroughly integrate and analyze children’s digital games in localization thinking.

Suggested Citation

  • Joni Tzuchen Tang, 2022. "A Practical Action Research of Portfolio Assessment on Building the Learning Community for Graduate Students in Taiwan," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 35(4), pages 555-578, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:35:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-021-09583-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-021-09583-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-021-09583-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-021-09583-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chris Craney & Tara McKay & April Mazzeo & Janet Morris & Cheryl Prigodich & Robert de Groot, 2011. "Cross-Discipline Perceptions of the Undergraduate Research Experience," The Journal of Higher Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(1), pages 92-113, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katelyn M Cooper & Logan E Gin & Barierane Akeeh & Carolyn E Clark & Joshua S Hunter & Travis B Roderick & Deanna B Elliott & Luis A Gutierrez & Rebecca M Mello & Leilani D Pfeiffer & Rachel A Scott &, 2019. "Factors that predict life sciences student persistence in undergraduate research experiences," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-30, August.
    2. Gaye D. Ceyhan & Alia N. Thompson & Jeremy D. Sloane & Jason R. Wiles & Sule Aksoy & John W. Tillotson, 2019. "The Socialization and Retention of Low-Income College Students: The Impact of a Wrap-Around Intervention," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(6), pages 249-249, December.
    3. Deborah Faye Carter & Hyun Kyoung Ro & Benjamin Alcott & Lisa R. Lattuca, 2016. "Co-Curricular Connections: The Role of Undergraduate Research Experiences in Promoting Engineering Students’ Communication, Teamwork, and Leadership Skills," Research in Higher Education, Springer;Association for Institutional Research, vol. 57(3), pages 363-393, May.
    4. Shannon N. Davis & Sarah E. Wagner, 2019. "Research Motivations and Undergraduate Researchers’ Disciplinary Identity," SAGE Open, , vol. 9(3), pages 21582440198, July.
    5. Carlie D. Trott & Andrea E. Weinberg & Laura B. Sample McMeeking, 2018. "Prefiguring Sustainability through Participatory Action Research Experiences for Undergraduates: Reflections and Recommendations for Student Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-21, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:35:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11213-021-09583-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.