IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/syspar/v33y2020i6d10.1007_s11213-019-09503-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Viability Theory and PSI Theory Interrelation Inspired by Bunge Systemic Classification: the Viable System Ontology Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Nora Mouhib

    (University Mohammed V)

  • Slimane Bah

    (University Mohammed V)

  • Abdelaziz Berrado

    (University Mohammed V)

Abstract

This paper proposes a new theory called the Viable System Ontology Theory, which is an interrelation among two well-known theories in social science. The former is the Viability theory that is widely recognized through the Viable System Model, and covers the function design of a business. The latter is Performance in Social Interaction (PSI) Theory that provides a deep understanding of business processes and covers the construction design of a business. Both theories have the same referent with different extents. In addition, PSI theory starts when the Viability theory approaches its limits. In order to consider systematically both theories, relationships between their concepts are established. This interrelation is inspired by Bunge Systemic Classification of Concepts. The Viable System Ontology Theory intends to support the ontological design of a viable system, its operation and business processes. Furthermore, it provides a way of interrelating existing theories through the analysis of their concepts.

Suggested Citation

  • Nora Mouhib & Slimane Bah & Abdelaziz Berrado, 2020. "Viability Theory and PSI Theory Interrelation Inspired by Bunge Systemic Classification: the Viable System Ontology Theory," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(6), pages 675-701, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:33:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-019-09503-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11213-019-09503-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11213-019-09503-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11213-019-09503-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ali Azadeh & Kosar Darivandi & Ehsan Fathi, 2012. "Diagnosing, Simulating and Improving Business Process Using Cybernetic Laws and the Viable System Model: The Case of a Purchasing Process," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 66-86, January.
    2. Weigand, H. & de Moor, A., 2001. "A framework for the normative analysis of workflow loops," Other publications TiSEM 5d0a5422-ecb8-483b-b5a6-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. David Lowe & Louise Martingale & Mike Yearworth, 2016. "Guiding interventions in a multi-organisational context: combining the Viable System Model and Hierarchical Process Modelling for use as a Problem Structuring Method," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 67(12), pages 1481-1495, December.
    4. Amin Vahidi & Alireza Aliahmadi, 2019. "Describing the Necessity of Multi-Methodological Approach for Viable System Model: Case Study of Viable System Model and System Dynamics Multi-Methodology," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(1), pages 13-37, February.
    5. Jan Achterbergh & Dirk Vriens, 2009. "Beer: Functional Design Principles for Viable Infrastructures," Springer Books, in: Organizations, chapter 0, pages 177-221, Springer.
    6. José Pérez Ríos, 2012. "Design and Diagnosis for Sustainable Organizations," Springer Books, Springer, edition 127, number 978-3-642-22318-1, December.
    7. Weigand, H. & de Moor, A., 2001. "A framework for the normative analysis of workflow loops," Other publications TiSEM 1aae537b-afb1-4bf2-9118-0, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    8. J. D. R. de Raadt, 1990. "Information transmission in viable systems," Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 41(2), pages 111-120, March.
    9. Barile, Sergio & Pels, Jaqueline & Polese, Francesco & Saviano, Marialuisa, 2012. "An introduction to the viable systems approach and its contribution to marketing," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 5(2), pages 54-78.
    10. Kevin J. Foster, 1997. "Cybernetic Risk Analysis," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 17(2), pages 215-225, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francesca Iandolo & Pietro Vito & Francesca Loia & Irene Fulco & Mario Calabrese, 2021. "Drilling down the viable system theories in business, management and accounting: A bibliometric review," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 738-755, November.
    2. Ali Azadeh & Kosar Darivandi Shoushtari & Mortezza Saberi & Ebrahim Teimoury, 2014. "An Integrated Artificial Neural Network and System Dynamics Approach in Support of the Viable System Model to Enhance Industrial Intelligence: The Case of a Large Broiler Industry," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(2), pages 236-257, March.
    3. Weigand, H. & de Moor, A., 2002. "Searching for communication norms," Other publications TiSEM a2698597-c067-4b08-aed6-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    4. Jacqueline Y. Sánchez-García & Juan E. Núñez-Ríos & Manuel Soto-Pérez & Pedro Pablo Cardoso-Castro & Alejandro Rodríguez-Magaña, 2020. "A Systems Science Approach to Inter-Organisational Complementarity in Tourism SMEs," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(1), pages 1-25, February.
    5. Hans Weigand & Mareike Schoop & Aldo de Moor & Frank Dignum, 2003. "B2B Negotiation Support: The Need for a Communication Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 3-29, January.
    6. van der Poll, F. & Weigand, H. & de Moor, A., 2002. "Communication diagnosis of a financial service process," Other publications TiSEM db72bc68-2bef-48ca-8466-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    7. Ali Azadeh & Kosar Darivandi & Ehsan Fathi, 2012. "Diagnosing, Simulating and Improving Business Process Using Cybernetic Laws and the Viable System Model: The Case of a Purchasing Process," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(1), pages 66-86, January.
    8. Vincenzo Formisano & Bernardino Quattrociocchi & Maria Fedele & Mario Calabrese, 2018. "From Viability to Sustainability: The Contribution of the Viable Systems Approach (VSA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    9. Barile, Sergio & Carrubbo, Luca & Iandolo, Francesca & Caputo, Francesco, 2013. "From 'EGO' to 'ECO' in B2B relationships," jbm - Journal of Business Market Management, Free University Berlin, Marketing Department, vol. 6(4), pages 228-253.
    10. Hart, Diane & Paucar-Caceres, Alberto, 2017. "A utilisation focussed and viable systems approach for evaluating technology supported learning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 259(2), pages 626-641.
    11. Emmanuel D. Adamides & Konstantinos Georgousoglou & Yannis Mouzakitis, 2023. "Designing a Flexible and Adaptive Municipal Waste Management Organisation Using the Viable System Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-24, September.
    12. Elena Tavella & L. Alberto Franco, 2015. "Dynamics of Group Knowledge Production in Facilitated Modelling Workshops: An Exploratory Study," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 451-475, May.
    13. Maria Vincenza Ciasullo & Rocco Palumbo & Orlando Troisi, 2017. "Reading Public Service Co-Production through the Lenses of Requisite Variety," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(2), pages 1-1, January.
    14. Francesco Polese & Carmen Gallucci & Luca Carrubbo & Rosalia Santulli, 2021. "Predictive Maintenance as a Driver for Corporate Sustainability: Evidence from a Public-Private Co-Financed R&D Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, May.
    15. Ion Georgiou & Joaquim Heck, 2021. "The emergence of problem structuring methods, 1950s–1989: An atlas of the journal literature," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(6), pages 756-796, November.
    16. Julio César Puche-Regaliza & Alfredo Jiménez & Pablo Arranz-Val, 2020. "Diagnosis of Software Projects Based on the Viable System Model," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(2), pages 215-236, April.
    17. Gerald Midgley & Erik Lindhult, 2021. "A systems perspective on systemic innovation," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 635-670, October.
    18. Zeinab Rezaee & Adel Azar & Abbas Moghbel Ba Erz & Mahmoud Dehghan Nayeri, 2019. "Application of Viable System Model in Diagnosis of Organizational Structure," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 273-295, June.
    19. Matteo Gaeta & Francesca Loia & Debora Sarno & Luca Carrubbo, 2021. "Online Social Network Viability: Misinformation Management Based on Service and Systems Theories," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, July.
    20. Marialuisa Saviano & Fabiana Sciarelli & Azzurra Rinaldi & Georcelin G. Alowanou, 2019. "Healthcare and SDGs Governance in Light of the Sustainability Helix Model: Evidence from the African Continent," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-20, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:syspar:v:33:y:2020:i:6:d:10.1007_s11213-019-09503-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.