Two-sample empirical likelihood method for difference between coefficients in linear regression model
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- Lixing Zhu & Liugen Xue, 2006. "Empirical likelihood confidence regions in a partially linear single-index model," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 68(3), pages 549-570.
- Cui, Hengjian & Chen, Song Xi, 2003. "Empirical likelihood confidence region for parameter in the errors-in-variables models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(1), pages 101-115, January.
- Shi, Jian & Lau, Tai-Shing, 2000. "Empirical Likelihood for Partially Linear Models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 132-148, January.
- Jing, Bing-Yi, 1995. "Two-sample empirical likelihood method," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 24(4), pages 315-319, September.
- Chen, S. X., 1994. "Empirical Likelihood Confidence Intervals for Linear Regression Coefficients," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 24-40, April.
- Song Chen, 1993. "On the accuracy of empirical likelihood confidence regions for linear regression model," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 45(4), pages 621-637, December.
- Wang, Qi-Hua & Jing, Bing-Yi, 1999. "Empirical likelihood for partial linear models with fixed designs," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 425-433, February.
CitationsCitations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
- Tsao, Min & Wu, Fan, 2015. "Two-sample extended empirical likelihood for estimating equations," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1-15.
- Gabriela Ciuperca & Zahraa Salloum, 2015. "Empirical likelihood test in a posteriori change-point nonlinear model," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 78(8), pages 919-952, November.
- Weihua Zhao & Riquan Zhang & Yukun Liu & Jicai Liu, 2015. "Empirical likelihood based modal regression," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 411-430, May.
- Ai-Ai Liu & Han-Ying Liang, 2017. "Jackknife empirical likelihood of error variance in partially linear varying-coefficient errors-in-variables models," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(1), pages 95-122, March.
- Wei Yu & Cuizhen Niu & Wangli Xu, 2014. "An empirical likelihood inference for the coefficient difference of a two-sample linear model with missing response data," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 77(5), pages 675-693, July.
More about this item
KeywordsBartlett correction; Coverage accuracy; Empirical likelihood; Linear regression model; Two-sample problem; Primary 62G05; Secondary 62E20;
StatisticsAccess and download statistics
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpapr:v:53:y:2012:i:1:p:83-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla) or (Rebekah McClure). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.