IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/sjobre/v50y1998i4d10.1007_bf03371509.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

HGB versus US-GAAP: Die Einstellungen deutscher Führungskräfte zur globalen Harmonisierung der Rechnungslegung

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Glaum

    (Europa-Universität Viadrina)

Abstract

Summary The starting point of the present paper are systematic differences between the answers of carporate managers and professors in an empirical study by C&L Deutsche Revision AG (1995) on accounting harmonization. In this study managers had expressed themselves in all questions more positively towards current German accounting and more negatively towards US-accounting than professors. The fundamental assumption put forward in this paper is that these differences are due to differences in the economic interests of the two groups of participants. In order to test far this empirically, hypotheses are deduced with regard to the accountingrelated interests of the executive managers. The idea behind the hypotheses is that managers’ answers to questions in the C&L Industry Study can be explained by structural features of their respective companies. The hypotheses are tested using multiple regression analysis. The results of the tests show that managers’ answers can, at least to some extent, be explained by the suggested multiple regression approach. However, the answers to a rather general and abstract question (the preferred balance between the true-and-fair-view and prudence accounting principles) can be explained much better than the anwers with regard to detailed USGAAP regulations. We must assume that the managers’ attitudes towards concrete US-GAAP which are directly related to carporate accounting practice are influenced by a multitude of firm-specific and personal factors.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Glaum, 1998. "HGB versus US-GAAP: Die Einstellungen deutscher Führungskräfte zur globalen Harmonisierung der Rechnungslegung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 50(4), pages 336-359, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:50:y:1998:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03371509
    DOI: 10.1007/BF03371509
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/BF03371509
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/BF03371509?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:bla:kyklos:v:43:y:1990:i:3:p:437-71 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jensen, Michael C, 1986. "Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(2), pages 323-329, May.
    3. Reinhard H. Schmidt & Marcel Tyrell, 1997. "Financial Systems, Corporate Finance and Corporate Governance," European Financial Management, European Financial Management Association, vol. 3(3), pages 333-361, November.
    4. Ball, R & Brown, P, 1968. "Empirical Evaluation Of Accounting Income Numbers," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6(2), pages 159-178.
    5. Lev, B, 1989. "On The Usefulness Of Earnings And Earnings Research - Lessons And Directions From 2 Decades Of Empirical-Research," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27, pages 153-192.
    6. Morck, Randall & Yeung, Bernard, 1992. "Internalization : An event study test," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 33(1-2), pages 41-56, August.
    7. Beaver, Wh, 1968. "Information Content Of Annual Earnings Announcements," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 6, pages 67-92.
    8. Holmstrom, Bengt R. & Tirole, Jean, 1989. "The theory of the firm," Handbook of Industrial Organization, in: R. Schmalensee & R. Willig (ed.), Handbook of Industrial Organization, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 2, pages 61-133, Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Glaum, Martin & Mandler, Udo, 1997. "German managers' attitudes towards Anglo-American accounting: Results from an empirical study on global accounting harmonization," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 32(4), pages 463-485.
    2. Kothari, S. P., 2001. "Capital markets research in accounting," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(1-3), pages 105-231, September.
    3. Pascal Dumontier & Bernard Raffournier, 2002. "Accounting and capital markets: a survey of the European evidence," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 119-151.
    4. Ruey S. Tsay & Yi-Mien Lin & Hsiao-Wen Wang, 2009. "Residual income, non-earnings information, and information content," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(6), pages 487-511.
    5. Ray Ball & Lakshmanan Shivakumar, 2008. "How Much New Information Is There in Earnings?," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 46(5), pages 975-1016, December.
    6. Peter D. Easton & Steven J. Monahan & Florin P. Vasvari, 2009. "Initial Evidence on the Role of Accounting Earnings in the Bond Market," Journal of Accounting Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(3), pages 721-766, June.
    7. Amir, Eli & Lev, Baruch, 1996. "Value-relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communications industry," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1-3), pages 3-30, October.
    8. Shuai Shao & Robert Stoumbos & X. Frank Zhang, 2021. "The power of firm fundamental information in explaining stock returns," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(4), pages 1249-1289, December.
    9. Dimitrios Kousenidis & Christos Negakis & Iordanis Floropoulos, 2000. "Size and book-to-market factors in the relationship between average stock returns and average book returns: some evidence from an emerging market," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 9(2), pages 225-243.
    10. Itay Kama, 2009. "On the Market Reaction to Revenue and Earnings Surprises," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1‐2), pages 31-50, January.
    11. Itay Kama, 2009. "On the Market Reaction to Revenue and Earnings Surprises," Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(1-2), pages 31-50.
    12. Bård Misund, 2016. "Vertical integration and value-relevance: Empirical evidence from oil and gas producers," Cogent Economics & Finance, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(1), pages 1264107-126, December.
    13. Ball, Ray & Brown, Philip, 2019. "Ball and Brown (1968) after fifty years," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 410-431.
    14. Joachim Hoegh-Krohn, Nils E. & Knivsfla, Kjell Henry, 2000. "Accounting for Intangible Assets in Scandinavia, the UK, the US, and by the IASC: Challenges and a Solution," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 35(2), pages 243-265, July.
    15. Misund, Bård & Asche, Frank & Osmundsen, Petter, 2008. "Industry upheaval and valuation: Empirical evidence from the international oil and gas industry," The International Journal of Accounting, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 398-424, December.
    16. Das, Somnath & King, Alexander Z., 2021. "Measuring the informativeness of earnings announcements: The role of event windows," The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 350-367.
    17. Martin Wallmeier, 2009. "Kapitalmarktwirkungen der Berichterstattung zur Unternehmensleistung," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 61(2), pages 212-224, March.
    18. Jean-Francois Gajewski & Bertrand Quere, 2001. "The information content of earnings and turnover announcements in France," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(4), pages 679-704.
    19. Ahsan Habib, 2010. "Value relevance of alternative accounting performance measures: Australian evidence," Accounting Research Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 23(2), pages 190-212, September.
    20. Landsman, Wayne R. & Maydew, Edward L. & Thornock, Jacob R., 2012. "The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 34-54.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sjobre:v:50:y:1998:i:4:d:10.1007_bf03371509. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.