IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v68y2006i3d10.1007_s11192-006-0125-x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Klavans

    (SciTech Strategies, Inc.)

  • Kevin W. Boyack

    (Sandia National Laboratories)

Abstract

Summary This article describes recent improvements in mapping the world-wide scientific literature. Existing research is extended in three ways. First, a method for generating maps directly from the data on the relationships between hundreds of thousands of documents is presented. Second, quantitative techniques for evaluating these large maps of science are introduced. Third, these techniques are applied to data in order to evaluate eight different maps. The analyses suggest that accuracy can be increased by using a modified cosine measure of relatedness. Disciplinary bias can be significantly reduced and accuracy can be further increased by using much lower threshold levels. In short, much larger samples of papers can and should be used to generate more accurate maps of science.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Klavans & Kevin W. Boyack, 2006. "Quantitative evaluation of large maps of science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 68(3), pages 475-499, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:68:y:2006:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-006-0125-x
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0125-x
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-006-0125-x
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-006-0125-x?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ying Huang & Wolfgang Glänzel & Lin Zhang, 2021. "Tracing the development of mapping knowledge domains," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(7), pages 6201-6224, July.
    2. Boyack, Kevin W. & Klavans, Richard, 2008. "Measuring science–technology interaction using rare inventor–author names," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(3), pages 173-182.
    3. Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2010. "Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(2), pages 523-538, August.
    4. Rongying Zhao & Bikun Chen, 2014. "Applying author co-citation analysis to user interaction analysis: a case study on instant messaging groups," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(2), pages 985-997, November.
    5. Silvia Santini & Vittoria Borghese & Carlo Baggio, 2023. "HBIM-Based Decision-Making Approach for Sustainable Diagnosis and Conservation of Historical Timber Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    6. Cathelijn J. F. Waaijer & Cornelis A. Bochove & Nees Jan Eck, 2011. "On the map: Nature and Science editorials," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 86(1), pages 99-112, January.
    7. van Eck, N.J.P. & Waltman, L., 2009. "VOSviewer: A Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2009-005-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    8. Waltman, Ludo & van Eck, Nees Jan & Noyons, Ed C.M., 2010. "A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(4), pages 629-635.
    9. Hai-Yun Xu & Zeng-Hui Yue & Chao Wang & Kun Dong & Hong-Shen Pang & Zhengbiao Han, 2017. "Multi-source data fusion study in scientometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(2), pages 773-792, May.
    10. Zehra Taşkın & Arsev U. Aydinoglu, 2015. "Collaborative interdisciplinary astrobiology research: a bibliometric study of the NASA Astrobiology Institute," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 103(3), pages 1003-1022, June.
    11. Richard Klavans & Kevin W. Boyack, 2008. "Thought leadership: A new indicator for national and institutional comparison," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 75(2), pages 239-250, May.
    12. del Río, Pablo & Kiefer, Christoph P., 2023. "Academic research on renewable electricity auctions: Taking stock and looking forward," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    13. Quirin, Arnaud & Cordón, Oscar & Vargas-Quesada, Benjamín & de Moya-Anegón, Félix, 2010. "Graph-based data mining: A new tool for the analysis and comparison of scientific domains represented as scientograms," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 4(3), pages 291-312.
    14. Kevin W. Boyack, 2009. "Using detailed maps of science to identify potential collaborations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 79(1), pages 27-44, April.
    15. Marianne Hörlesberger & Ivana Roche & Dominique Besagni & Thomas Scherngell & Claire François & Pascal Cuxac & Edgar Schiebel & Michel Zitt & Dirk Holste, 2013. "A concept for inferring ‘frontier research’ in grant proposals," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 97(2), pages 129-148, November.
    16. Richard Klavans & Kevin W. Boyack, 2010. "Toward an objective, reliable and accurate method for measuring research leadership," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(3), pages 539-553, March.
    17. Juan Pablo Bascur & Suzan Verberne & Nees Jan Eck & Ludo Waltman, 2023. "Academic information retrieval using citation clusters: in-depth evaluation based on systematic reviews," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(5), pages 2895-2921, May.
    18. Sun, Xiaoling & Ding, Kun & Lin, Yuan, 2016. "Mapping the evolution of scientific fields based on cross-field authors," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(3), pages 750-761.
    19. Kevin W. Boyack & Katy Börner & Richard Klavans, 2009. "Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 79(1), pages 45-60, April.
    20. Ryo Takahashi & Kenji Kaibe & Kazuyuki Suzuki & Sayaka Takahashi & Kotaro Takeda & Marc Hansen & Michiaki Yumoto, 2023. "New concept of the affinity between research fields using academic journal data in Scopus," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(6), pages 3507-3534, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:68:y:2006:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-006-0125-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.