IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v52y2001i3d10.1023_a1014247900224.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chinese-Indian-German Collaboration Results that Provided the Impetus for the Foundation of COLLNET

Author

Listed:
  • Hildrun Kretschmer

    (I.S.S.I.)

  • Liang Liming

    (Henan Normal University)

  • Ramesh Kundra

    (National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (NISTADS))

Abstract

The collaboration model of Kretschmer was applied to the co-authorshipnetwork of Indian medicine with the aim of being able to observe changes instructure over a period of 30 years. The idea of Liang, on her “Distributionof Major Scientific and Cultural Achievements in Terms of Age” was putin relation to the collaboration model by Kretschmer.

Suggested Citation

  • Hildrun Kretschmer & Liang Liming & Ramesh Kundra, 2001. "Chinese-Indian-German Collaboration Results that Provided the Impetus for the Foundation of COLLNET," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(3), pages 445-456, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:52:y:2001:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1014247900224
    DOI: 10.1023/A:1014247900224
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1014247900224
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1023/A:1014247900224?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ramesh Kundra & Hildrun Kretschmer, 1999. "A new model of scientific collaboration part 2. Collaboration patterns in Indian medicine," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(3), pages 519-528, November.
    2. Hildrun Kretschmer, 1999. "A new model of scientific colloboration part 1. Theoretical approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 46(3), pages 501-518, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luka Kronegger & Anuška Ferligoj & Patrick Doreian, 2011. "On the dynamics of national scientific systems," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 45(5), pages 989-1015, August.
    2. Christos Kolympiris & Sebastian Hoenen & Peter G. Klein, 2019. "Learning by Seconding: Evidence from National Science Foundation Rotators," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 528-551, May.
    3. Jiang Li & Yueting Li, 2015. "Patterns and evolution of coauthorship in China’s humanities and social sciences," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 1997-2010, March.
    4. Ramesh Kundra & Dimiter Tomov, 2001. "Collaboration Patterns in Indian and Bulgarian Epidemiology of Neoplasms in Medline for 1966–1999," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 52(3), pages 519-523, November.
    5. Radhamany Sooryamoorthy, 2010. "Medical research in South Africa: a scientometric analysis of trends, patterns, productivity and partnership," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 84(3), pages 863-885, September.
    6. Fuyuki Yoshikane & Takayuki Nozawa & Susumu Shibui & Takafumi Suzuki, 2009. "An analysis of the connection between researchers’ productivity and their co-authors’ past attributions, including the importance in collaboration networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 79(2), pages 435-449, May.
    7. Wah Yun Low & Kwan Hoong Ng & M. A. Kabir & Ai Peng Koh & Janaki Sinnasamy, 2014. "Trend and impact of international collaboration in clinical medicine papers published in Malaysia," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1521-1533, February.
    8. Fuyuki Yoshikane & Kyo Kageura, 2004. "Comparative analysis of coauthorship networks of different domains: The growth and change of networks," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 60(3), pages 435-446, August.
    9. Jane Payumo & Taurean Sutton & Derek Brown & Dan Nordquist & Marc Evans & Danna Moore & Prema Arasu, 2017. "Input–output analysis of international research collaborations: a case study of five U.S. universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 111(3), pages 1657-1671, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:52:y:2001:i:3:d:10.1023_a:1014247900224. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.