IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i5d10.1007_s11192-025-05331-0.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The link between dissertation metadata completeness and user engagement in an institutional repository

Author

Listed:
  • Behrooz Rasuli

    (Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc))

  • Michael Boock

    (Oregon State University)

  • Joachim Schöpfel

    (University of Lille)

  • Brenda Wyk

    (The University of Pretoria)

Abstract

This study investigates the role of metadata quality in Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs), focusing on its completeness and its impact on discoverability and user engagement within institutional repositories (IRs). Using DSpace@MIT as a case study, the current research analyzed 22,276 doctoral dissertations to assess metadata completeness and its correlation with the number of views and downloads. Various metadata fields and usage statistics were extracted for detailed analysis. The study identified a moderate positive correlation between the numbers of unique metadata fields and both the Department Views Ratio (DVR) and Department Download Ratio (DDR), suggesting that enriched metadata can improve the visibility and accessibility of dissertations. Additionally, the length of abstracts is positively correlated with engagement metrics (significance level for all reported results

Suggested Citation

  • Behrooz Rasuli & Michael Boock & Joachim Schöpfel & Brenda Wyk, 2025. "The link between dissertation metadata completeness and user engagement in an institutional repository," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2875-2899, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05331-0
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05331-0
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05331-0
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05331-0?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Babak Sohrabi & Hamideh Iraj, 2017. "The effect of keyword repetition in abstract and keyword frequency per journal in predicting citation counts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(1), pages 243-251, January.
    2. Hamid R. Jamali & Mahsa Nikzad, 2011. "Article title type and its relation with the number of downloads and citations," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 88(2), pages 653-661, August.
    3. Besiki Stvilia & Les Gasser & Michael B. Twidale & Linda C. Smith, 2007. "A framework for information quality assessment," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 58(12), pages 1720-1733, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anqi Ma & Yu Liu & Xiujuan Xu & Tao Dong, 2021. "A deep-learning based citation count prediction model with paper metadata semantic features," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(8), pages 6803-6823, August.
    2. Martorell Cunil, Onofre & Otero González, Luis & Durán Santomil, Pablo & Mulet Forteza, Carlos, 2023. "How to accomplish a highly cited paper in the tourism, leisure and hospitality field," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    3. Sergio Jimenez & Youlin Avila & George Dueñas & Alexander Gelbukh, 2020. "Automatic prediction of citability of scientific articles by stylometry of their titles and abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 125(3), pages 3187-3232, December.
    4. Kayvan Kousha & Mike Thelwall, 2024. "Factors associating with or predicting more cited or higher quality journal articles: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 75(3), pages 215-244, March.
    5. Hou Zhu & Li Shuhuai, 2024. "Instant prediction of scientific paper cited potential based on semantic and metadata features: Taking artificial intelligence field as an example," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(12), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Sepideh Fahimifar & Khadijeh Mousavi & Fatemeh Mozaffari & Marcel Ausloos, 2023. "Identification of the most important external features of highly cited scholarly papers through 3 (i.e., Ridge, Lasso, and Boruta) feature selection data mining methods," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3685-3712, August.
    7. Ajiferuke, Isola & Famoye, Felix, 2015. "Modelling count response variables in informetric studies: Comparison among count, linear, and lognormal regression models," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 499-513.
    8. Kong, Ling & Wang, Dongbo, 2020. "Comparison of citations and attention of cover and non-cover papers," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 14(4).
    9. Letchford, Adrian & Preis, Tobias & Moat, Helen Susannah, 2016. "The advantage of simple paper abstracts," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8.
    10. Cui, Geng & Chung, Yuho & Peng, Ling & Wang, Qiaofei, 2024. "Clicks for money: Predicting video views through a sentiment analysis of titles and thumbnails," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    11. Nicolas Jullien, 2012. "What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)," Post-Print hal-00857208, HAL.
    12. Hei-Chia Wang & Tzu-Ting Hsu & Yunita Sari, 2019. "Personal research idea recommendation using research trends and a hierarchical topic model," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 121(3), pages 1385-1406, December.
    13. repec:plo:pone00:0125093 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Muhammad Salman Khan & Muhammad Younas, 2017. "Analyzing readers behavior in downloading articles from IEEE digital library: a study of two selected journals in the field of education," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 110(3), pages 1523-1537, March.
    15. Bai, Xiaomei & Zhang, Fuli & Lee, Ivan, 2019. "Predicting the citations of scholarly paper," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 407-418.
    16. Wan Siti Nur Aiza & Liyana Shuib & Norisma Idris & Nur Baiti Afini Normadhi, 2024. "Features, techniques and evaluation in predicting articles’ citations: a review from years 2010–2023," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 1-29, January.
    17. Don Watson & Manfred Krug & Claus-Christian Carbon, 2022. "The relationship between citations and the linguistic traits of specific academic discourse communities identified by using social network analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(4), pages 1755-1781, April.
    18. Sutthisak Srisawad & Kullacha Lertsittiphan & Sirirut Tunsirirut & Pennapa Saenkla, 2025. "Predicting the time to first citation for medical articles using survival analysis and the association between this time and citation counts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(2), pages 861-880, February.
    19. Gianna Kexin Jiang & Yajun Jiang, 2023. "More diversity, more complexity, but more flexibility: research article titles in TESOL Quarterly, 1967–2022," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 128(7), pages 3959-3980, July.
    20. Rafał Zbonikowski, 2025. "What influences the number of citations of scientific articles? Study on colloid and interface science," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2577-2593, May.
    21. Shesen Guo & Ganzhou Zhang & Qiuhong Ju & Yu Chen & Qianfeng Chen & Lulu Li, 2015. "The evolution of conceptual diversity in economics titles from 1890 to 2012," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2073-2088, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05331-0. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.