Author
Listed:
- Liyue Chen
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Jielan Ding
(Chinese Academy of Sciences
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Donghuan Song
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
- Zihao Qu
(Chinese Academy of Sciences)
Abstract
Scientific contributions are a direct reflection of a research paper's value, demonstrating its impact on existing theories or practices. Existing research mainly focuses on the authors' perceived or self-identified contributions, while the actual contributions which are the contributions of papers to other research in the context of scholarly communication are rarely investigated. This research studies the actual contributions of papers and further explores the labor input patterns of which from an input–output perspective, based on papers published in Nature and Science using 1.53 million citation contexts from citing literature. Additionally, we design a method for identifying the types of scientific contributions using large language model technology. Results show that the distribution of the actual contributions of studied papers is unbalanced, with experimental contributions being predominant, contrasting with majority of the theoretical and methodological contributions self-identified by authors, which highlights a notable discrepancy between actual contributions and authors' self-perceptions, indicating an "ideal bias." Regarding the input–output patterns of actual contributions, there is no significant correlation between the overall labor input pattern and the actual contribution pattern of papers, but a positive correlation is observed between input and output for specific types of scientific contributions, reflecting a "more effort, more gain" effect. As for the internal relationships among different types of scientific contributions, different types of DOL input in papers exhibit a notable co-occurrence trend; while, once the paper reaches the dissemination stage, the co-occurrence of different types of actual contributions becomes weaker, indicating that a paper’s actual contributions often concentrate on a single type.
Suggested Citation
Liyue Chen & Jielan Ding & Donghuan Song & Zihao Qu, 2025.
"Exploring scientific contributions through citation context and division of labor,"
Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(5), pages 2901-2921, May.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05318-x
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05318-x
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05318-x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.