IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v130y2025i3d10.1007_s11192-025-05251-z.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Low awareness but high willingness to engage in science communication: a cross-disciplinary survey study in a Japanese University

Author

Listed:
  • Yoshihiko Kobayashi

    (Oita University)

  • Kuriko Kudo

    (Kyushu University)

  • Toshiya Kobayashi

    (Kyushu University)

  • Hiroko Kinoshita

    (Kyushu University)

  • HyunJung Bang

    (Kyushu University)

  • Hiroshi Ito

    (Kyushu University)

  • Akihiro Kishimura

    (Kyushu University)

  • Yusuke Matsumoto

    (Pino Inc.)

  • Masato Miwa

    (Information Technologies, and Nanotechnologies)

  • Motoko Unoki

    (The University of Tokyo)

  • Tamaki Yoshioka

    (Kyushu University)

Abstract

Researchers play a pivotal role as key actors in science communication. Therefore, it is imperative for academic institutions to support their activities. However, there are many uncertainties regarding activities by researcher and institutional support. Notably, researchers’ awareness and experience of these activities need to be clarified. Therefore, we conducted a questionnaire survey on researchers at Kyushu University in Japan to assess their awareness of and willingness to participate in science communication activities. The survey was conducted between 2021 and 2022. We sent a questionnaire to 2,336 researchers and received responses from 577 (24.7%). The survey revealed that the awareness of science communication was not very high (43%). Remarkably, awareness among medical, dental, and pharmaceutical researchers was relatively low. However, all field researchers recognized the importance of the activities and had a strong willingness to participate if given the opportunity. Furthermore, the results show that researchers in the humanities and social sciences had a relatively high awareness of promoting science communication in Japanese Science, Technology, and Innovation policy. Researchers over 40 years of age had more experience than researchers aged 20–39 years. Barriers such as time constraints and lack of regulation of personnel evaluation were reaffirmed.

Suggested Citation

  • Yoshihiko Kobayashi & Kuriko Kudo & Toshiya Kobayashi & Hiroko Kinoshita & HyunJung Bang & Hiroshi Ito & Akihiro Kishimura & Yusuke Matsumoto & Masato Miwa & Motoko Unoki & Tamaki Yoshioka, 2025. "Low awareness but high willingness to engage in science communication: a cross-disciplinary survey study in a Japanese University," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 130(3), pages 1357-1370, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05251-z
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-025-05251-z
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-025-05251-z
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-025-05251-z?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anthony Dudo & John C Besley, 2016. "Scientists’ Prioritization of Communication Objectives for Public Engagement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Abhay S. D. Rajput & Sangeeta Sharma, 2022. "Top Indian scientists as public communicators: a survey of their perceptions, attitudes and communication behaviors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3167-3192, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adrian Rauchfleisch & Mike S Schäfer & Dario Siegen, 2021. "Beyond the ivory tower: Measuring and explaining academic engagement with journalists, politicians and industry representatives among Swiss professors," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, May.
    2. repec:plo:pone00:0171818 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Kaisu Koivumäki & Timo Koivumäki & Erkki Karvonen, 2020. "“On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 425-439.
    4. Matthew S. VanDyke & Andy J. King, 2018. "Using the CAUSE Model to Understand Public Communication about Water Risks: Perspectives from Texas Groundwater District Officials on Drought and Availability," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(7), pages 1378-1389, July.
    5. Kaisu Koivumäki & Timo Koivumäki & Erkki Karvonen, 2020. "“On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 425-439.
    6. Mónica García-Melón & Tomás Gómez-Navarro & Hannia Gonzalez-Urango & Carmen Corona-Sobrino, 2022. "Adapting RRI public engagement indicators to the Spanish scientific and innovation context: a participatory methodology based on AHP and content analysis," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 30(4), pages 1483-1512, December.
    7. Abhay S. D. Rajput & Sangeeta Sharma, 2022. "Top Indian scientists as public communicators: a survey of their perceptions, attitudes and communication behaviors," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(6), pages 3167-3192, June.
    8. Mikhaila N Calice & Becca Beets & Luye Bao & Dietram A Scheufele & Isabelle Freiling & Dominique Brossard & Noah Weeth Feinstein & Laura Heisler & Travis Tangen & Jo Handelsman, 2022. "Public engagement: Faculty lived experiences and perspectives underscore barriers and a changing culture in academia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(6), pages 1-21, June.
    9. Jamie Alexander Greig & Shelli Rampold & Emily Paskewitz & Taylor Ruth, 2024. "Waving through a window: Agricultural research faculty perspectives on science communication challenges," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, June.
    10. John C Besley & Kathryn O’Hara & Anthony Dudo, 2019. "Strategic science communication as planned behavior: Understanding scientists’ willingness to choose specific tactics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(10), pages 1-18, October.
    11. Dominic Balog‐Way & Katherine McComas & John Besley, 2020. "The Evolving Field of Risk Communication," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(S1), pages 2240-2262, November.
    12. Paige Brown Jarreau & Imogene A Cancellare & Becky J Carmichael & Lance Porter & Daniel Toker & Samantha Z Yammine, 2019. "Using selfies to challenge public stereotypes of scientists," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-23, May.
    13. Emily L Howell & Julia Nepper & Dominique Brossard & Michael A Xenos & Dietram A Scheufele, 2019. "Engagement present and future: Graduate student and faculty perceptions of social media and the role of the public in science engagement," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, May.
    14. Adina Nerghes & Bob Mulder & Ju-Sung Lee, 2022. "Dissemination or participation? Exploring scientists’ definitions and science communication goals in the Netherlands," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-29, December.
    15. Hui Chen & Noriko Hara & Clinton McKay, 2021. "Investigating mediated public engagement with science on the “science” subreddit: From the participants’ perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:130:y:2025:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-025-05251-z. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.