IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/scient/v105y2015i3d10.1007_s11192-015-1758-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contribution of the institutional repositories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to the webometric indicators of their home institutions

Author

Listed:
  • Wenqiang Fan

    (Beihang University)

Abstract

Starting from the perspective of Webometrics, this paper explores the improvement effect of institutional repositories (IRs) on their home institutions with respect to web presence and visibility. Taking 19 IRs from institutions affiliated to the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) as study samples, we calculate the contribution of IRs to the webometric indicators of their home institutions in terms of four indicators: page counts, PDF counts, URL mention counts, and link counts. According to their open-access (OA) status, the IRs of CAS were divided into an OA group and a non-OA group, which were compared with respect to differences in the above indicators as well as browse counts and download counts. The results of the study show that: (1) IRs showed a relatively significant positive improvement with respect to Google page counts, Scholar page counts, and Google PDF counts, although the improvement effect with respect to Scholar PDF counts was almost nonexistent; (2) repositories presented a certain improvement effect with respect to URL mention counts, but the contribution of link counts was limited; and (3) OA repositories manifested noticeable advantages in terms of Google PDF counts, URL mention counts, and download counts. We conclude that IRs can improve the web presence and visibility of their home institutions, while OA IRs offer more benefits to their home institutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenqiang Fan, 2015. "Contribution of the institutional repositories of the Chinese Academy of Sciences to the webometric indicators of their home institutions," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 105(3), pages 1889-1909, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1758-4
    DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1758-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-015-1758-4
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11192-015-1758-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Isidro F. Aguillo & José L. Ortega & Mario Fernández & Ana M. Utrilla, 2010. "Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 82(3), pages 477-486, March.
    2. Alastair G. Smith, 2008. "Benchmarking Google Scholar with the New Zealand PBRF research assessment exercise," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 74(2), pages 309-316, February.
    3. Bo-Christer Björk & Patrik Welling & Mikael Laakso & Peter Majlender & Turid Hedlund & Guðni Guðnason, 2010. "Open Access to the Scientific Journal Literature: Situation 2009," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(6), pages 1-9, June.
    4. Bo-Christer Björk & Mikael Laakso & Patrik Welling & Patrik Paetau, 2014. "Anatomy of green open access," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 65(2), pages 237-250, February.
    5. Mike Thelwall & Pardeep Sud, 2011. "A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(8), pages 1488-1497, August.
    6. Jihyun Kim, 2010. "Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 61(9), pages 1909-1922, September.
    7. Enar Ruiz-Conde & Aurora Calderón-Martínez, 2014. "University institutional repositories: competitive environment and their role as communication media of scientific knowledge," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1283-1299, February.
    8. Mike Thelwall & Gareth Harries, 2003. "The connection between the research of a university and counts of links to its web pages: An investigation based upon a classification of the relationships of pages to the research of the host univers," Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 54(7), pages 594-602, May.
    9. Mike Thelwall & Pardeep Sud, 2011. "A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 62(8), pages 1488-1497, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wenqiang Fan & Qinghui Liu, 2016. "Open scholarship ranking of Chinese research universities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 108(2), pages 673-691, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Enrique Orduña-Malea & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2015. "The dark side of open access in Google and Google Scholar: the case of Latin-American repositories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(1), pages 829-846, January.
    2. Enrique Orduña-Malea, 2021. "Dot-science top level domain: Academic websites or dumpsites?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(4), pages 3565-3591, April.
    3. Benedetto Lepori & Isidro F. Aguillo & Marco Seeber, 2014. "Size of web domains and interlinking behavior of higher education institutions in Europe," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 100(2), pages 497-518, August.
    4. Amalia Mas-Bleda & Mike Thelwall & Kayvan Kousha & Isidro F. Aguillo, 2014. "Do highly cited researchers successfully use the social web?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 101(1), pages 337-356, October.
    5. Sandra Miguel & Ely Francina Tannuri de Oliveira & Maria Cláudia Cabrini Grácio, 2016. "Scientific Production on Open Access: A Worldwide Bibliometric Analysis in the Academic and Scientific Context," Publications, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-15, January.
    6. Carlos Olmeda-Gómez & Maria-Antonia Ovalle-Perandones & Antonio Perianes-Rodríguez, 2017. "Co-word analysis and thematic landscapes in Spanish information science literature, 1985–2014," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 113(1), pages 195-217, October.
    7. Mikael Laakso & Juho Lindman & Cenyu Shen & Linus Nyman & Bo-Christer Björk, 2017. "Research output availability on academic social networks: implications for stakeholders in academic publishing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 27(2), pages 125-133, May.
    8. Vivek Kumar Singh & Rajesh Piryani & Satya Swarup Srichandan, 2020. "The case of significant variations in gold–green and black open access: evidence from Indian research output," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 124(1), pages 515-531, July.
    9. Lepori, Benedetto & Barberio, Vitaliano & Seeber, Marco & Aguillo, Isidro, 2013. "Core–periphery structures in national higher education systems. A cross-country analysis using interlinking data," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 622-634.
    10. Junwei Ma & Jianhua Wang & Philip Szmedra, 2019. "Sustainable Competitive Position of Mobile Communication Companies: Comprehensive Perspectives of Insiders and Outsiders," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, April.
    11. Enrique Orduña-Malea & John J. Regazzi, 2014. "U.S. academic libraries: understanding their web presence and their relationship with economic indicators," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(1), pages 315-336, January.
    12. Aurora Calderón-Martínez & Enar Ruiz-Conde, 2015. "Leading emerging markets: capturing and diffusing scientific knowledge through research-oriented repositories," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 104(3), pages 907-930, September.
    13. Julie Baldwin & Stephen Pinfield, 2018. "The UK Scholarly Communication Licence: Attempting to Cut through the Gordian Knot of the Complexities of Funder Mandates, Publisher Embargoes and Researcher Caution in Achieving Open Access," Publications, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-28, July.
    14. Srijana Acharya & Han Woo Park, 2017. "Open data in Nepal: a webometric network analysis," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 51(3), pages 1027-1043, May.
    15. David Gunnarsson Lorentzen, 2014. "Webometrics benefitting from web mining? An investigation of methods and applications of two research fields," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 99(2), pages 409-445, May.
    16. Li Zhang & Erin Watson, 2018. "The prevalence of green and grey open access: Where do physical science researchers archive their publications?," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 117(3), pages 2021-2035, December.
    17. Stephen Pinfield & Christine Middleton, 2016. "Researchers’ Adoption of an Institutional Central Fund for Open-Access Article-Processing Charges," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(1), pages 21582440156, January.
    18. Teja Koler-Povh & Primož Južnič & Goran Turk, 2014. "Impact of open access on citation of scholarly publications in the field of civil engineering," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 98(2), pages 1033-1045, February.
    19. Isidro F. Aguillo, 2020. "Altmetrics of the Open Access Institutional Repositories: a webometrics approach," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(3), pages 1181-1192, June.
    20. Sergio Copiello, 2020. "Digital multimedia tools, research impact, stated and revealed preferences: a rejoinder on the issue of video abstracts," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(1), pages 543-551, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:scient:v:105:y:2015:i:3:d:10.1007_s11192-015-1758-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.